Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant therapy with exemestane, anastrozole, letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with operable and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
“…Incremental LYs gained varied between 0.103 [36] and 1.046 [25] and incremental QALYs gained varied between 0.120 [36] and 0.566 [25]. Cost of 1 LY gained was found to vary between €8,451 [37] and €46,072 [25], and the cost of 1 QALY gained varied between €12,871 [37] and €72,112 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All studies used the ATAC trial [32] to obtain transition probabilities and were performed from a health-care payer perspective. Incremental life-years (LYs) gained ranged from 0.16 [26] to 0.550 [24], with an ICER ranging from €3,958 [28] to €75,331 [25]. Incremental quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) gained ranged from 0.092 [30] to 0.378 [28], with a cost per QALY gained varying from €3,696 [28] to €120,265 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness of switching to exemestane after 2 to 3 years of therapy with tamoxifen compared to continuing tamoxifen was determined in five selected studies [25,[35][36][37][38]. All studies used the Intergroup Exemestane Study [33], and one also used the SEERMedicare data [37] to obtain probabilities, and two analyses used the health-care payer perspective [25,36], and for two, it was unclear [35,37]; however, because only direct costs were included, we assumed that a health-care payer perspective was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies used the Intergroup Exemestane Study [33], and one also used the SEERMedicare data [37] to obtain probabilities, and two analyses used the health-care payer perspective [25,36], and for two, it was unclear [35,37]; however, because only direct costs were included, we assumed that a health-care payer perspective was used. Incremental LYs gained varied between 0.103 [36] and 1.046 [25] and incremental QALYs gained varied between 0.120 [36] and 0.566 [25]. Cost of 1 LY gained was found to vary between €8,451 [37] and €46,072 [25], and the cost of 1 QALY gained varied between €12,871 [37] and €72,112 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual studies applied a time horizon of 7.5 [36], 10 [25,30], 20 [25,26,28 -30], 25 [14,15,31], 30 [17,18,39], 35 [37], 40 [41], 50 years [27], or lifetime [16,24,35,38,40] (see Table 3 for an overview per therapy group).…”
Despite similar comparators and logical differences due to transferability issues, the outcomes of the included studies varied widely. To increase comparability and transparency of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, standardization of modeling methods for different therapeutic groups/diseases and the availability of a detailed and complete description of the model used in the evaluation is advocated. Recommendations for standardization in modeling treatment strategies in early breast cancer are presented.
“…Incremental LYs gained varied between 0.103 [36] and 1.046 [25] and incremental QALYs gained varied between 0.120 [36] and 0.566 [25]. Cost of 1 LY gained was found to vary between €8,451 [37] and €46,072 [25], and the cost of 1 QALY gained varied between €12,871 [37] and €72,112 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All studies used the ATAC trial [32] to obtain transition probabilities and were performed from a health-care payer perspective. Incremental life-years (LYs) gained ranged from 0.16 [26] to 0.550 [24], with an ICER ranging from €3,958 [28] to €75,331 [25]. Incremental quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) gained ranged from 0.092 [30] to 0.378 [28], with a cost per QALY gained varying from €3,696 [28] to €120,265 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness of switching to exemestane after 2 to 3 years of therapy with tamoxifen compared to continuing tamoxifen was determined in five selected studies [25,[35][36][37][38]. All studies used the Intergroup Exemestane Study [33], and one also used the SEERMedicare data [37] to obtain probabilities, and two analyses used the health-care payer perspective [25,36], and for two, it was unclear [35,37]; however, because only direct costs were included, we assumed that a health-care payer perspective was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies used the Intergroup Exemestane Study [33], and one also used the SEERMedicare data [37] to obtain probabilities, and two analyses used the health-care payer perspective [25,36], and for two, it was unclear [35,37]; however, because only direct costs were included, we assumed that a health-care payer perspective was used. Incremental LYs gained varied between 0.103 [36] and 1.046 [25] and incremental QALYs gained varied between 0.120 [36] and 0.566 [25]. Cost of 1 LY gained was found to vary between €8,451 [37] and €46,072 [25], and the cost of 1 QALY gained varied between €12,871 [37] and €72,112 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual studies applied a time horizon of 7.5 [36], 10 [25,30], 20 [25,26,28 -30], 25 [14,15,31], 30 [17,18,39], 35 [37], 40 [41], 50 years [27], or lifetime [16,24,35,38,40] (see Table 3 for an overview per therapy group).…”
Despite similar comparators and logical differences due to transferability issues, the outcomes of the included studies varied widely. To increase comparability and transparency of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, standardization of modeling methods for different therapeutic groups/diseases and the availability of a detailed and complete description of the model used in the evaluation is advocated. Recommendations for standardization in modeling treatment strategies in early breast cancer are presented.
Objetivos. El objetivo principal es posicionar los resultados obtenidos de un estudio económico de pegfilgrastim en las tablas clasificatorias de coste-efectividad de intervenciones sanitarias publicadas en España durante el período 1997-2006. Métodos. Para elaborar las tablas clasificatorias se llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica en tres importantes bases de datos. El periodo de búsqueda fue desde 1997 hasta 2006. Con el empleo de los criterios de selección establecidos se localizaron 29 publicaciones con 42 observaciones de razones coste-efectividad incremental (RCEI) por AVAC ganados y 24 publicaciones con 42 observaciones de RCEI por AVG ganados. Los resultados se actualizaron a valores del año 2006. Resultados. Excluyendo los valores extremos de las 42 observaciones para AVAC, se tienen 37 observaciones con una media de 12.295 € por AVAC ganado (IC del 95%: 7.534 €; 17.056 €). Considerando las 42 observaciones para AVG la media por RCEI fue de 22.339 € (IC del 95%: 8.703 €-35.975 €). Los resultados de la RCEI por AVAC ganado con pegfilgrastim fueron: (1) frente a filgrastim administrado durante 11 días: pegfilgrastim opción dominante y (2) frente a filgrastim administrado durante 6 días: 13.933 €. Los resultados de la RCEI por AVG con pegfilgrastim fueron: (1) frente a filgrastim administrado durante 11 días: pegfilgrastim opción dominante y (2) frente a filgrastim administrado durante 6 días: 13.180 €. Conclusiones. Los resultados del análisis de evaluación económica de pegfilgrastim frente a filgrastim, medidos tanto en AVG como en AVAC, se encuentran dentro de los rangos de las razones de coste-efectividad incrementales obtenidas en la revisión de la literatura para España durante el período 1997-2006.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.