2006
DOI: 10.1002/j.2055-2335.2006.tb00878.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacoeconomics: a Reliable Tool for Decisions on New Medicines?

Abstract: Aim:To provide a literature-based review of the reliability of pharmacoeconomics as a tool for decisions on new medicines. Method: Medline and Embase databases were searched. Articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals were selected according to relevance, and bibliographies searched for other relevant articles. All articles were assessed for information and opinions on the use of pharmacoeconomics, methodology and quality of studies, and reliability in decision-making. Results: Over 1000 articles … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent editorials and publications, pharmacists have been encouraged to apply pharmacoepidemiology skills, although the term itself did not routinely appear. [6][7][8][9] Although courses in pharmacoepidemiology are offered by other universities (e.g. University of New South Wales, courses in Pharmaceutical Medicine and Drug Development) I enrolled in the University of Newcastle Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Graduate Diploma in Clinical Epidemiology).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent editorials and publications, pharmacists have been encouraged to apply pharmacoepidemiology skills, although the term itself did not routinely appear. [6][7][8][9] Although courses in pharmacoepidemiology are offered by other universities (e.g. University of New South Wales, courses in Pharmaceutical Medicine and Drug Development) I enrolled in the University of Newcastle Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Graduate Diploma in Clinical Epidemiology).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%