1993
DOI: 10.1097/00008571-199308000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacogenetics of cocaine: I. Locomotor activity and self-selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, morphine strongly and dose-dependently activated C57 mice but inhibited DBA mice. Such opposite phenotypes are in accord with data obtained by other studies (Jones et al 1993;Murphy et al 2001;Zocchi et al 1998) and do not support a predictive relationship between the incentive properties and psychomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine or morphine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…By contrast, morphine strongly and dose-dependently activated C57 mice but inhibited DBA mice. Such opposite phenotypes are in accord with data obtained by other studies (Jones et al 1993;Murphy et al 2001;Zocchi et al 1998) and do not support a predictive relationship between the incentive properties and psychomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine or morphine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several studies using inbred strains of mice have reported pharmacokinetic differences that could account for differential COC-induced locomotor activation Reith et al, 1987;Wiener and Reith, 1990;Jones et al, 1993). Others have found increased number and affinity of DATs in the NAc of high, compared to low, novelty responders (Chefer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to interpret this finding, given the often contradictory results of other studies. For example, some studies have found no difference between B6J and D2J mice (Jones et al 1993;Phillips et al 1998), while others have reported greater activation in the D2J strain (Womer et al 1994;Rocha et al 1998). Still others have reported a more complex behavioral response to cocaine between these two strains, with no differences observed at lower doses, while D2J mice exhibited greater activation at higher doses Carney 1994, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies, using inbred strains of mice, have reported evidence for pharmacokinetic differences which could account for differential cocaine-induced locomotor activation Reith et al 1987;Wiener and Reith 1990;Reith and Selmeci 1991;Jones et al 1993), others have shown that differences in behavioral sensitivity to cocaine cannot be explained by differences in cocaine disposition (Ruth et al 1988;Womer et al 1993;Rocha et al 1998). To the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined distribution of cocaine in the blood or brain following acute administration in B10SnJ, BR, or L mice; it is possible that the atypical behavioral response to cocaine we observed in these strains may be due, at least in part, to genetically mediated pharmacokinetic differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%