2019
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drug penetration is a consideration for central nervous system (CNS) infections, resulting in different breakpoints for CNS and non‐CNS infections for β‐lactams, and it would seem that this may also apply to other sites of infection. However, to what extent this is clinically relevant has not been completely explored, and most pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models recommend targets based on serum concentrations . In our case, using an estimate of 30% ceftazidime penetration into the ELF and assuming 10% protein binding, the patient achieved an estimated 20% f T > 4×MIC over the dosing interval while receiving CAZ‐AVI 2.5 g every 8 hours and CVVHDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Drug penetration is a consideration for central nervous system (CNS) infections, resulting in different breakpoints for CNS and non‐CNS infections for β‐lactams, and it would seem that this may also apply to other sites of infection. However, to what extent this is clinically relevant has not been completely explored, and most pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models recommend targets based on serum concentrations . In our case, using an estimate of 30% ceftazidime penetration into the ELF and assuming 10% protein binding, the patient achieved an estimated 20% f T > 4×MIC over the dosing interval while receiving CAZ‐AVI 2.5 g every 8 hours and CVVHDF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The broader and more general question most clinically relevant to our specific patient is how current recommended dosages relate to critically ill patients and whether or not serum drug concentrations should serve as a surrogate for the drug concentration achieved at the site of infection. Another study raised several important concerns in dosing CAZ‐AVI in critically ill patients, such as alterations in volume of distribution and protein binding. By using Monte Carlo simulation with 5000 patient iterations, these authors concluded that 2.5 g every 8 hours should suffice for dosing critically ill patients with isolates with a CAZ‐AVI MIC of 8 μg/ml or lower and creatinine clearance values more than 50 ml/minute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from published studies of ceftazidime and avibactam among critically ill patients were collected. 29 The concentration versus time curve was generated using a one-compartment model for CAZ and AVI. The targeted PK and PD indexes of ceftazidime were represented as the percentage of free drug time exceeding MIC (% f Time>MIC), and the target value was 50 and 100%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariates that affected the VD of both ceftazidime and avibactam were body weight, and mechanical ventilated patients when treated for nosocomial pneumonia, and treatment indication (40). Another PK study was carried out in 10 critically ill patients receiving ceftazidimeavibactam to once again evaluate adequacy of proposed standard dosage regimens (41). Both studies showed that standard dosage regimens resulted in a >90% probability of attaining the PD of 8 mg/L during >50% of the time for a relatively heterogenous patient population.…”
Section: Ceftzidime-avibactammentioning
confidence: 99%