BACKGROUND. The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)is increasing worldwide because of the growing public interest in natural or holistic therapies and because of the flow of information through the Internet. However, there is a lack of communication between cancer patients and their physicians on topics relating to CAM. The authors performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of Japanese clinical oncologists toward cancer CAM.
METHODS.The CAM questionnaires were sent to 2118 clinical oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on background (age, gender, years in practice, specialty, and knowledge of cancer CAM), perception (effectiveness/ineffectiveness, scientific evidence, and drug interactions), and attitude (experience with and response to CAM users). Questions about oncologists' perceptions and attitudes to CAM were limited to herbs and other natural products that were sold over the counter.
RESULTS.One hundred sixty-six questionnaires were returned as undeliverable. Of the remaining questionnaires, 751 were returned (a response rate of 39%). Twothirds of the responders were surgical oncologists and most of the remaining responders were medical oncologists. The majority of oncologists (82%) believed that CAM products were ineffective against cancer. The main reason for this belief was a lack of reliable information (as cited by 85% of oncologists). Only 13% of oncologists had experienced CAM-associated disease improvement in their cancer patients. Of all the oncologists, 84% considered the possibility of drug interactions between anticancer drugs and CAM products. The majority of oncologists (80%) replied that they could neither promote the use of CAM products nor recommend quitting the products, when they were asked about the use of CAM products by cancer patients. I nterest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown rapidly in the past decade. Some of the reasons for the increased interest include Internet marketing, dissatisfaction with mainstream medicine, and a desire of patients to be involved actively in their own health care, especially natural or holistic therapies. 1,2 The use of CAM has become prevalent in most industrialized countries.
CONCLUSIONS.
© 2003 American Cancer SocietyFor example, 48% of the population in Australia, 3 70% of the population in Canada, 4 42% of the population in the U.S., 5 31% of the population in Belgium, and 49% of the population in France 6 have used CAM at least once.By the 1990s, surveys showed that CAM was being used widely by cancer patients. The prevalence ranged from 7% to 64% of patients sampled in 26 studies conducted worldwide. 7 Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer medicine (e.g., Chinese traditional remedies, acupuncture, and other natural products, such as shark cartilage and beeswax-pollen mixtures) is widely available in Japan and Western countries. We found that 32% of cancer patients in Japan used CAM without having sufficient information. 8 There was a lack of commun...