2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic immunoassay methods in the presence of soluble target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its ease of access, plasma remains the gold standard matrix for basic PK characterization and constitutes the central point of reference for the assessment of drug distribution, clearance and thus half‐life 1 . Depending on drug binding to plasma proteins 7 and/or circulating soluble targets, 8,9 either the total drug concentration in plasma or its free fraction should be used for PK. The distribution of most drugs will change if its unbound fraction is altered.…”
Section: Ten Parameters Of Interest To Reach the Drugs' Sites Of Actimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its ease of access, plasma remains the gold standard matrix for basic PK characterization and constitutes the central point of reference for the assessment of drug distribution, clearance and thus half‐life 1 . Depending on drug binding to plasma proteins 7 and/or circulating soluble targets, 8,9 either the total drug concentration in plasma or its free fraction should be used for PK. The distribution of most drugs will change if its unbound fraction is altered.…”
Section: Ten Parameters Of Interest To Reach the Drugs' Sites Of Actimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in infections and particularly in malignancies continuously changing expression patterns. Additionally, PK evaluation based on total plasma concentrations can be biased by plasma protein binding 7 or the presence of shed and circulating soluble targets 8,9 . In these cases, the unbound drug fraction in plasma can be more informative, not least because it can change over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in assays where target interference is anticipated or known to be an issue, an anti-ID mAb might be less appealing than pAbs as an assay detection reagent, but this would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. 18 CDR-specific pAbs are typically affinity purified using the CDR of a rhumAb. In general, CDRspecific pAbs can tolerate interference from soluble target better than anti-ID mAbs because they comprise a mixture of antibodies with different specificities, subclasses and affinities; however, CDR-specific pAbs may not have good lot-to-lot consistency in reagent performance.…”
Section: Generating Mab 10c4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is important to determine what forms are measured with a given LBA, especially if the concentration of soluble drug target is not negligible compared to the drug concentration at the time point of measurement. 12 There is still an ongoing debate about what form of the drug is the most relevant to measure. 13 Anti-idiotypic antibodies that bind to the paratope of the therapeutic antibody typically interfere with drug-target binding and are therefore inhibitory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%