Data from three pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies of amprenavir and ritonavir were used to develop a pharmacokinetic interaction model using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect model). A two-compartment linear model with first-order absorption best fit the amprenavir data, while a one-compartment model was used to describe the ritonavir data. The inhibition of elimination of amprenavir by ritonavir was modeled with a maximum effect (E max ) inhibition model and the observed ritonavir concentration. Monte Carlo simulation was then used to predict amprenavir concentrations for various combinations of amprenavir and ritonavir in twice-daily and once-daily dosing regimens. Simulated minimum amprenavir concentrations in plasma (C min ) in twice-daily and once-daily dosing regimens were compared with protein binding-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC 50 s) for clinical human immunodeficiency virus isolates with different susceptibilities to protease inhibitors (central tendency ratios). The model based on the first two studies predicted the results of the third study. Data from all three studies were then combined to refine the final model. The observed and simulated noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters agreed well. From this model, several candidate drug regimens were simulated. These simulations suggest that, in patients who have clinically failed a traditional amprenavir regimen, a regimen of 600 mg of amprenavir with 100 mg of ritonavir twice daily would result in C min -to-IC 50 ratios similar to that of 1,200 mg of amprenavir twice daily alone for wild-type viruses. In addition, once-daily regimens that result in C min s above the protein binding-corrected IC 50 s for wild-type virus are clearly feasible.Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors have prolonged and improved the quality of life for HIV-infected patients (2,9,10,17,21). Despite these advances, failure of therapeutic regimens to control viral replication is a major concern in the management of patients with HIV infection. Several factors are believed to contribute to this failure, including subtherapeutic drug concentrations resulting from drug interactions (22), adverse events (5), and poor adherence or nonadherence to the prescribed regimen because the regimens are complex and require frequent dosing with a large number of capsules (29).A strong correlation between antiviral activity and the concentrations of PIs in plasma has been demonstrated in several studies (1,7,8,18,26,28). Subtherapeutic concentrations of PIs in plasma can be associated with viral rebound and the development of drug resistance, indicating the importance of maintaining consistent drug concentrations in plasma (1,7,8,18,26,28). A regimen that results in increased trough exposures could potentially provide therapy for patients with drugresistant viruses and make once-daily (q.d.) dosing a feasible therapeutic option.Amprenavir (Agenerase; formerly 141W94) is a recently introduced HIV PI. ...