1988
DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198800366-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Carvedilol in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study Neugebauer et al [14] demonstrated an AUC of 292 ng. h. ml-1 after oral administration of 50 mg carvedilol to 10 young (mean age 29.5 y) male subj ects, confirming their previous results [6,7,11]. In accordance with these results, the effects of oral administration of 50 mg carvedilol on blood pressure and heart rate in patients with chronic renal failure seem to be comparable to those in essential hypertensive patients [2][3][4].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In another study Neugebauer et al [14] demonstrated an AUC of 292 ng. h. ml-1 after oral administration of 50 mg carvedilol to 10 young (mean age 29.5 y) male subj ects, confirming their previous results [6,7,11]. In accordance with these results, the effects of oral administration of 50 mg carvedilol on blood pressure and heart rate in patients with chronic renal failure seem to be comparable to those in essential hypertensive patients [2][3][4].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…h. ml-~ [10]; terminal halflife tI/z 14.6 (4.0) h [8], 7.0 (1.9) or7.6 (3.9) h [9]; Morgan et al [10] reported a half-life of 5.0 (1.2) or 5.3 (0.7) h, but it is not clear from their paper whether that half-life represents the terminal half-life. The age distribution in the above studies was 61 (6) y [8], 45 (10) y [9], and < 50 y (patient Group 1) or 65-80 y (patient Group 2) [11]. In contrast to the above results, one study reported an AUC of 348 ng-ml, h ~ (170-611) and a terminal half-life of 6.4 h Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations