2018
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000001655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tenofovir Reduced-Glycerin 1% Gel in the Rectal and Vaginal Compartments in Women: A Cross-Compartmental Study With Directly Observed Dosing

Abstract: In this study of 14 days each of vaginal and rectal application of TFV reduced-glycerin 1% gel, we found only a small degree of cross-compartment distribution of TFV in RF and vaginal fluids and no pharmacodynamic activity in ex vivo testing. Although high TFV concentrations in the dosing compartment may be protective, low cross-compartment tissue concentrations are not likely to be protective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single product that protects both the (neo)vagina and rectum after dosing in only one mucosal location remains a challenge for topical agents, in contrast to systemically dosed FTC/TDF PrEP. Tenofovir poorly penetrates from rectum to vagina and vice versa; however, FTC and maraviroc dosed via an intravaginal ring achieve rectal fluid concentrations in the range of the in vitro IC 90 , indicating potential for dual-compartment protection for some drugs (43)(44)(45). A simpler development approach, although more complex in clinical use, would be a product that could be applied in whichever sexual compartment is at risk.…”
Section: Rectal Microbicide Formulations In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single product that protects both the (neo)vagina and rectum after dosing in only one mucosal location remains a challenge for topical agents, in contrast to systemically dosed FTC/TDF PrEP. Tenofovir poorly penetrates from rectum to vagina and vice versa; however, FTC and maraviroc dosed via an intravaginal ring achieve rectal fluid concentrations in the range of the in vitro IC 90 , indicating potential for dual-compartment protection for some drugs (43)(44)(45). A simpler development approach, although more complex in clinical use, would be a product that could be applied in whichever sexual compartment is at risk.…”
Section: Rectal Microbicide Formulations In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily vaginal dosing of the TFV 1% gel achieved very low TFV-DP concentrations in rectal tissue, detectable in only 15% of women (27 fmol/mg lower limit of quantification), indicating concentrations well below simultaneous vaginal tissue concentrations (166 fmol/mg). 78 These rectal tissue concentrations after vaginal dosing predict very low, if any, protection from RAI for women using these vaginal products.…”
Section: Vaginal Product Underperformancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Participants were not so enamored of the rectal gel applicator, borrowed from the vaginal development program, and consensus among investigators was that applicator dosing would not be acceptable in extended RCTs . MTN‐014 demonstrated poor penetration of TFV into vaginal tissue after rectal RGVF dosing, indicating a future TFV rectal product applied rectally would not likely perform well protecting vaginal HIV infection …”
Section: Last and Next Generation Tfv Microbicide Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 This value provides a population-level estimate of protection among women with varying levels of adherence, whereas the causal parameter of interest to prospective ring users and their providers is product efficacy when used, with analyses conditioned on high adherence estimating ring efficacy of 65%–75%. 5 The ring does not provide protection in acts of anal intercourse (AI) due to minimal dissemination of drug from the vagina to the rectum, 6,7 although it may still provide some overall risk reduction by reducing transmission in acts of vaginal intercourse (VI). Prior analyses suggested that any AI in the trial would have a minimal impact on overall estimates of efficacy yet estimated that the ring reduced HIV-1 risk among women reporting any AI by only 18% (95% confidence interval: −57, 57).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%