2011
DOI: 10.4158/ep10192.or
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics And Relative Bioavailability Of Absorbed Testosterone After Administration Of A 1.62% Testosterone Gel To Different Application Sites In Men With Hypogonadism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new formulation of testosterone gel (1.62%) was developed that delivers testosterone with a lower volume of gel than the current product. This allows the patient to reduce the total mass of gel applied from the current 5.0 g to 10.0 g per day to 1.25 g to 5.0 g per day [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new formulation of testosterone gel (1.62%) was developed that delivers testosterone with a lower volume of gel than the current product. This allows the patient to reduce the total mass of gel applied from the current 5.0 g to 10.0 g per day to 1.25 g to 5.0 g per day [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One previous study has reported that the pharmacokinetics of scrotal application of testosterone gel was similar to that of a scrotal testosterone patch or a fivefold larger dose of non-scrotal testosterone gel, consistent with at least a fivefold higher transdermal bioavailability of testosterone (Kuhnert et al, 2005). Other studies assessing pharmacokinetics of testosterone application to non-scrotal skin have yielded variable time of peak concentration (Tmax) ranging from 6-16 h (Marbury et al, 2003;Miller et al, 2011;Olsson et al, 2014) but similar peak concentration (Cmax) as scrotal skin application (Rolf et al, 2002;Bouloux, 2005;Olsson et al, 2014). Although most studies revealed a marked delay in peak serum testosterone concentration, another study of 100 mg testosterone gel applied to non-scrotal skin in hypogonadal men reported rapid absorption kinetics and higher Cmax (≥13.4 ng/mL) (Wang et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Good safety profiles and high rates of patient compliance have been reported with gel use [14,17]. Upon discontinuation, serum testosterone returns to hypogonadal levels within 2 to 3 days, which may be an advantage should termination of treatment be desired or necessary [18]. Others, however, may be unintentionally exposed to the gel through skin‐to‐skin contact, so users of testosterone gel need to be made aware of this possibility and potential implications [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%