2022
DOI: 10.1111/jvp.13091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after intravascular, intraperitoneal, and oral administrations

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of cefquinome in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) following intravascular (IV), intraperitoneal (IP), and oral (PO) administrations at 14 ± 1°C. In this study, three hundred and six clinically healthy rainbow trout (110-140 g) were used. The fish received single IV, IP, and PO injections of cefquinome at 10 mg/kg dose. The plasma concentrations of cefquinome were measured using HPLC-UV and were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tolfenamic acid concentrations were determined for six fish at each sampling time and averaged. Pharmacokinetic data of tolfenamic acid were calculated from the average plasma concentration at sampling times, as documented in previous studies (Corum et al., 2023 ; Durna Corum et al., 2022 ). The area under the concentration (AUC) versus time curve, AUC extrapolated from t last to ∞ in % of the total AUC (AUC extrap %), volume of distribution at steady state ( V dss ), total body clearance (Cl T ), terminal elimination half‐life ( t 1/2λz ), mean residence time (MRT), mean absorption time (MAT = MRT IM,oral − MRT IV ) and bioavailability ( F = AUC IM,oral × 100/AUC IV ) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tolfenamic acid concentrations were determined for six fish at each sampling time and averaged. Pharmacokinetic data of tolfenamic acid were calculated from the average plasma concentration at sampling times, as documented in previous studies (Corum et al., 2023 ; Durna Corum et al., 2022 ). The area under the concentration (AUC) versus time curve, AUC extrapolated from t last to ∞ in % of the total AUC (AUC extrap %), volume of distribution at steady state ( V dss ), total body clearance (Cl T ), terminal elimination half‐life ( t 1/2λz ), mean residence time (MRT), mean absorption time (MAT = MRT IM,oral − MRT IV ) and bioavailability ( F = AUC IM,oral × 100/AUC IV ) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the WinNonlin 6.1.0.173 software program (Pharsight Corporation, Scientific Consulting Inc., Sunnyvale, NC, USA), the plasma concentration–time curves of doxycycline were plotted. After oral administration, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined via non-compartmental analysis using mean plasma concentrations of doxycycline collected at each sampling time [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. After the doxycycline administration, apparent volume of distribution (V darea /F), total body clearance (CL/F, area under the concentration–time curve (AUC), terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2ʎz ), AUC extrapolated from t last to ∞ in % of the total AUC (AUC extrap %), and mean residence time (MRT) were determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacokinetic non-compartmental analysis of OTC concentration-time data was analyzed using the WinNonlin 6.1.0.173 software (Pharsight Corporation, Scientific Consulting Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA). Pharmacokinetic parameters of OTC were calculated from the mean plasma concentration values collected at each sampling time, as reported in previous studies [20,21]. The pharmacokinetic parameters calculated included the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), AUC extrapolated from tlast to ∞ in % of the total AUC (AUC extrap %), volume of distribution at steady state (V dss = Cl T × MRT), apparent volume of distribution (V darea ), total body clearance (Cl T = Dose/AUC), terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%