2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus L.) after a single oral administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In muscle and liver of Atlantic salmon, the tissue/plasma ratios for OA where calculated to 5.7 and 5.9, respectively, demonstrating a much better distribution of OA in this species compared to lumpfish (22). In a similar pharmacokinetic study of FFC in lumpfish, only the head kidney/plasma ratio exceeded 1.0, indicating a substantial lower distribution of florfenicol (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In muscle and liver of Atlantic salmon, the tissue/plasma ratios for OA where calculated to 5.7 and 5.9, respectively, demonstrating a much better distribution of OA in this species compared to lumpfish (22). In a similar pharmacokinetic study of FFC in lumpfish, only the head kidney/plasma ratio exceeded 1.0, indicating a substantial lower distribution of florfenicol (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While the absorption rate for FLU was fast in lumpfish (plasma T max of 7.7 h) considerable variation in plasma T max has been documented in other fish species, with 6, 10, and 13.7 h in Atlantic salmon, 7 h in turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus L.), 7 and 20 h in Atlantic halibut and 24 h in Atlantic cod (19, 20, 25, 33, 34). In a recent study, a T max of 21.2 h was found for FFC in lumpfish held at 12°C (26), hence a significantly slower absorption rate compared to FLU and OA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relevant causes include handling, such as non-medicinal lice treatments; also skin wounds, fin erosions and mechanical injuries (some of which might be directly or indirectly related to different handling procedures), in addition to poor fish quality, environmental conditions, aggression/predation and disease, especially bacterial infections (Nilsen et al, 2014;Bornø et al, 2016;Hjeltnes et al, 2019;Mattilsynet, 2020). There is generally a lack of effective treatment protocols (Scholz et al, 2018a), although there are some recommendations for medicinal treatment of infectious diseases in cleaner fish (Gu & Skjelstad, ;Treasurer & Birkbeck, 2018;Pietrak & Backman, 2018;Powell et al, 2018;Scholz et al, 2018a;Kverme et al, 2019;Haugland et al, 2019). In addition, antimicrobial treatment is not necessarily effective against all types of pathogens, such as P. salmonis in salmonids (Rozas & Enriquez, 2014).…”
Section: Commercial and Experimental Vaccines For Cleaner Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%