1986
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198611060-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Metoclopramide in Cancer Patients

Abstract: The introduction of new cytotoxic drug regimens has been associated with an increase in the incidence and severity of adverse effects. This in turn has highlighted the need for more effective adjuvant therapy. The use of metoclopramide for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting, in high intravenous doses (50 to 1000 mg), has become established since 1981. As a lipid-soluble drug, metoclopramide has a large volume of distribution. The reported mean values after high doses range between 2.8 and 4.6 L/kg. The mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why this should be so is less obvious. The most substantial decrease in variance of clearance was actually not achieved " N by introducing demographic factors but by esti- '" (Bryson et al 1985;McGovern et al 1986). The loading and maintenance dose rate of 5000 ~g/min (300 mg/h) and 167 ~g/min (10 mg/h), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Why this should be so is less obvious. The most substantial decrease in variance of clearance was actually not achieved " N by introducing demographic factors but by esti- '" (Bryson et al 1985;McGovern et al 1986). The loading and maintenance dose rate of 5000 ~g/min (300 mg/h) and 167 ~g/min (10 mg/h), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The text file was transferred to the A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model was chosen to analyse the concentration-time data because the biexponential decline of concentrations after the maintenance infusion was both visible in the data (referring to individuals in whom 8 to 10 plasma concentrations were measured) and was reported in the literature (Bryson et al 1985). Moreover, both the constant protein binding of metoclopramide over a wide range of concentrations (Webb et al 1986) and a recent review of the pharmacokinetics of high-dose metoclopramide (McGovern et al 1986) support the assumption that a linear pharmacokinetic model is adequate, A recursive solution of a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order rate constants is provided in the NONMEM-PREDPP load module with the subroutine ADY AN3. This model updates the amount of drug in the central compartment at every time event after the initial dose.…”
Section: Nonmem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 µM; MW ≈ 336), but peak plasma concentrations of 3-7.5 µg ml −1 (ca. 9-22.5 µM) can be calculated (Ross-Lee et al, 1981;McGovern et al, 1986). Despite considerable pharmacokinetic variability, MCP is relatively safe owing to its large therapeutic index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The log of the plasma drug concentration was stable from 2-9 h after administration suggesting that this preparation would be suitable for 8 or 12 hourly administration. However the delay in Cmax may result in delayed or complete absence of clinical effect since a rapid rise in CNS concentration may be important for therapeutic effect (Bateman et al, 1978(Bateman et al, , 1979 McGovern et al, 1983;Taylor & Bateman, 1983;Meyer et al, 1984). Much lower plasma drug concentrations 20 ng ml-' increase gastric emptying after intravenous administration (Bateman et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies relating the plasma concentration of metoclopramide to therapeutic effect have been conducted in patients receiving chemotherapy. These drugs have a profound emetic effect and only very high plasma concentrations of metoclopramide (100-850 ng ml-1) have been reported to be effective (Bateman et al, 1979;McGovern et al, 1983;Taylor & Bateman, 1983;Meyer et al, 1984). Much lower plasma drug concentrations 20 ng ml-' increase gastric emptying after intravenous administration (Bateman et al, 1978).…”
Section: Spencementioning
confidence: 99%