1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01061419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function

Abstract: The pharmacokinetics of lisinopril was studied after administration of single and multiple doses of 5 mg to hypertensive patients with normal and impaired renal function. In patients with severe renal failure the peak concentrations were higher, the decline in serum concentration was slower and the time to peak concentration was extended. Accumulation of lisinopril was highly correlated with the creatinine clearance. The effective half-life was doubled and tripled in patients with mild and severe renal impairm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruncillo et al (1987) suggested that enalaprilat accumulation in patients with severe renal insufficiency could increase the incidence of clinically significant adverse events, and recommended that lower enalapril doses should be used in such patients. Van Schaik et al (1988) found that adverse events associated with lisinopril were more common in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function and suggested that dosage be reduced when GFR falls below 30 ml/min. Because of the risk of drug accumulation in other clinical studies with lisinopril (Donohue et al 1988) and enalapril (Abraham et al 1988), in the present study half the recommended dose was administered to patients with CLcR below 30 mlfmin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fruncillo et al (1987) suggested that enalaprilat accumulation in patients with severe renal insufficiency could increase the incidence of clinically significant adverse events, and recommended that lower enalapril doses should be used in such patients. Van Schaik et al (1988) found that adverse events associated with lisinopril were more common in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function and suggested that dosage be reduced when GFR falls below 30 ml/min. Because of the risk of drug accumulation in other clinical studies with lisinopril (Donohue et al 1988) and enalapril (Abraham et al 1988), in the present study half the recommended dose was administered to patients with CLcR below 30 mlfmin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…b Kelly et al (1986); Lowenthal et al (1985). c Jackson et al (1988); Kelly et al (1987); Kiintziger et al (1987);Van Schaik et al (1988). d Total captopril; Onoyama et al (1986).…”
Section: Moxonidinementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The elimination of lisinopril from plasma is polyphasic, with most being eliminated during the earlier phase (t'l2<' = 5 to 7h) which is followed at low concentrations by a prolonged terminal phase (t'l2!l) of about 30h (Lancaster & Todd 1988;VIm et al 1982;Kelly & O'Malley 1990). Impaired renal function was associated WIth 10-creased serum concentrations of lisinopril, prolonged tmax and decreased excretion rate and urinary recovery (Jackson et al 1988;Kelly et al 1987;Van Schaik et al 1988). Van Schaik et al (1988) found that during 8 days' treatment the accumulation of lisinopril in hypertensive patients with severe renal failure (CLcR = 5 to 30 ml/min) did not cause hypotension or toxic effects.…”
Section: Lisinoprilmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in hypertensive patients with impaired renal function, lisinopril accumulates, the accumulation being inversely correlated with creatinine clearance [128]. However, in hypertensive patients with impaired renal function, lisinopril accumulates, the accumulation being inversely correlated with creatinine clearance [128].…”
Section: Lisinoprilmentioning
confidence: 99%