1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004310050906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of oral fluconazole in premature infants

Abstract: Oral fluconazole seems to be a safe and effective treatment for Candida albicans septicaemia even in premature infants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A loading dose would be necessary to reach the desired steady-state concentration rapidly. Our data suggest that the lower fluconazole dosages frequently used in the neonatal population result in underexposure and may partially explain the prolonged periods of candidemia (5) and episodes of breakthrough candidemia (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A loading dose would be necessary to reach the desired steady-state concentration rapidly. Our data suggest that the lower fluconazole dosages frequently used in the neonatal population result in underexposure and may partially explain the prolonged periods of candidemia (5) and episodes of breakthrough candidemia (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is minimally metabolized, is eliminated as active drug in the urine, and effectively penetrates tissues and cerebrospinal fluid. Although it is frequently used in the neonatal population, remarkably little fluconazole PK data have been published for neonates, with studies being limited to a small number of preterm 24-to 29-weekgestation neonates (9,21,23). Existing data are thus insufficient for the development of a generalized dosing guidance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we set out to minimize the invasiveness of the prophylaxis while nonetheless allowing (by the oral route) its completion in neonates who no longer required an intravenous access, thus avoiding discontinuances before 30 and 45 days in NE-VLBW and ELBW neonates, respectively. Several clinical 24 and pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated the equal bioavailability of intravenous and oral fluconazole, [34][35][36]40 and in such neonates, continuing the prophylaxis is advisable because the risk factors for SFI do not disappear when the intravenous access is removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This schedule was based on experiences and published pharmacokinetic data from preterm neonates. 24,[33][34][35][36] Routine surveillance (serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations checked twice) was performed to record the presence of drug-related adverse effects or toxicity. Neonates were also screened for interactions between fluconazole and other concomitantly prescribed drugs and for any clinical manifestation that might be related to the use of fluconazole.…”
Section: Prophylaxis With Fluconazole In Group B Neonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous PK studies in infants suggested increasing fluconazole clearance (CL) over the first postnatal weeks (10)(11)(12)(13). However, the PK of fluconazole in infants of Ͻ750 g birth weight have not been extensively evaluated, and it is this population that has the highest risk for invasive candidiasis where prophylaxis has the most potential for benefit (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%