2000
DOI: 10.1177/147323000002800401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Orally and Intravenously Administered Telmisartan in Healthy Young and Elderly Volunteers and in Hypertensive Patients

Abstract: A series of studies was conducted in healthy young males and healthy elderly males or females to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of telmisartan. In addition, two phase-II clinical trials assessed the pharmacokinetics and the safety of telmisartan in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients. Telmisartan was given as a single oral (1-160 mg) or intravenous (10-160 mg) dose to young males. In another multiple-dose study, telmisartan 320 mg was administered orally once daily for 7 days to healthy young male sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
123
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
123
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The superiority of telmisartan over ramipril in this time period is consistent with the established pharmacokinetic profiles of these agents. [21][22][23] It is also consistent with the results of other trials using 24-h ABPM that have shown superior efficacy of telmisartan compared with antihypertensives from a range of classes, including losartan, 24,25 valsartan, 15,16 amlodipine 26 and perindopril. 27 Evidence that reduction of morning BP provides clinical benefit comes from a study of patients with type II diabetes, hypertension and nephropathy, in whom a reduction of morning SBP in response to antihypertensive treatment was shown to correlate significantly with a slowing of the progression of renal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The superiority of telmisartan over ramipril in this time period is consistent with the established pharmacokinetic profiles of these agents. [21][22][23] It is also consistent with the results of other trials using 24-h ABPM that have shown superior efficacy of telmisartan compared with antihypertensives from a range of classes, including losartan, 24,25 valsartan, 15,16 amlodipine 26 and perindopril. 27 Evidence that reduction of morning BP provides clinical benefit comes from a study of patients with type II diabetes, hypertension and nephropathy, in whom a reduction of morning SBP in response to antihypertensive treatment was shown to correlate significantly with a slowing of the progression of renal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The HLM CL int, u, met values for these compounds are 22, 29, 76, and 128 ml/min per milligram, respectively , smaller than the value for telmisartan [395 ml/min per milligram microsomal protein with bovine serum albumin (Gill et al, 2012), 1212 ml/min per milligram microsomal protein with bovine serum albumin (this study)]. However, their mean half-lives (3.4, 1.78, 1, and 1.2 hours, respectively) are much shorter than that of telmisartan (20 hours) (Lindahl et al, 1996;Weber et al, 1996;Muck et al, 1997;Stangier et al, 2000b;Niemi et al, 2005). To address the inconsistency between in vitro and in vivo observations, we hypothesize that telmisartan glucuronide is converted by intestinal microflora into telmisartan, and telmisartan experiences enterohepatic recirculation.…”
Section: Modeling and Simulations Of Plasma Pk During Elimination Phasesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Moreover, telmisartan was the only ARB that activated PPAR␥ when tested at lower concentrations (1 to 5 mol/L) that can be achieved in plasma with conventional oral dosing (data not shown). 39 Telmisartan concentrations of Ͻ10 mol/L did not significantly affect the activity of PPAR␣ or PPAR␦, although 25 mol/L telmisartan appeared to cause a modest activation (4-fold) of PPAR␣ (data not shown).…”
Section: Telmisartan Is a Partial Agonist Of Ppar␥mentioning
confidence: 87%