1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1996.tb00206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: Clinical Relevance

Abstract: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a safe and effective class of drugs for treatment of depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Among this class of drugs, pharmacodynamic actions, antidepressant efficacy and adverse effect profiles are remarkably similar. However, pharmacokinetic profiles of SSRIs are substantially different especially with respect to pharmacokinetically mediated drug-drug interactions. For example, fluoxetine and paroxetine produce clinically significant inhibition of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because this study evaluated only elderly subjects with no younger comparison group, and because our subjects did not reach steady state drug levels, it is diffi cult to compare values between studies. Our observations on the timing of the maximum concentrations at each visit of fl uoxetine, norfl uoxetine and their combined values support the observations cited earlier that it might take a considerable amount of time to reach steady state in the elderly [8,9] . The plasma concentrations reached in our elderly subjects are considerably higher than that previously reported by Harvey and Preskorn [8] for subjects receiving repeated doses of 40 mg a day, albeit with a different dose schedule.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Because this study evaluated only elderly subjects with no younger comparison group, and because our subjects did not reach steady state drug levels, it is diffi cult to compare values between studies. Our observations on the timing of the maximum concentrations at each visit of fl uoxetine, norfl uoxetine and their combined values support the observations cited earlier that it might take a considerable amount of time to reach steady state in the elderly [8,9] . The plasma concentrations reached in our elderly subjects are considerably higher than that previously reported by Harvey and Preskorn [8] for subjects receiving repeated doses of 40 mg a day, albeit with a different dose schedule.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These differences could in part be due to variations in drug administration regimens. FX clearance decreases and t 1/2 increases in humans with chronic drug dosing (Catterson and Preskorn, 1996;Hiemke and Härtter, 2000), and this appears due to FX-induced inhibition of CYP2D6 (Alfaro et al, 2000). We have observed a similar decrease in FX clearance in sheep during an 8-day i.v.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Currently there are five serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs 3 ) available worldwide with fluoxetine (Prozac; Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN) being the first SSRI introduced in the North American market in 1987 (Catterson and Preskorn, 1996;Hiemke and Härtter, 2000). More than a decade after its introduction, fluoxetine (FX) still remains one of the most frequently prescribed antidepressants of this class for the treatment of depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and eating disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide one example, a dose given orally will be subject to first-pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes in the liver, which are more active during pregnancy [71], and as such will result in a lower concentration than a dose administered by intraperitoneal injection or outside the pregnant state. Further complicating the issue, cytochrome P450 is inhibited by FLX, producing a non-linear relationship between drug dosage and drug concentration [72]. Additionally, stress is induced by some methods of administration, such as gavage [73] and injection [74], whereas other methods, such as administering FLX in the drinking water, are non-intrusive.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%