2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(17)30575-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of selonsertib, GS-9674, and/or GS-0976 in combination in healthy subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, participants with renal impairment may also have underlying impaired hepatic function. Based on results from completed hepatic‐impairment studies, dose adjustments are not considered necessary for either firsocostat or cilofexor in people with mild hepatic impairment, while those with moderate/severe impairment are to be excluded from clinical studies at this time 13,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, participants with renal impairment may also have underlying impaired hepatic function. Based on results from completed hepatic‐impairment studies, dose adjustments are not considered necessary for either firsocostat or cilofexor in people with mild hepatic impairment, while those with moderate/severe impairment are to be excluded from clinical studies at this time 13,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetics of firsocostat and cilofexor have been previously characterized in healthy participants following multiple‐dose administration ranging from 20 to 200 mg and from 10 to 300 mg, respectively. Plasma exposures of firsocostat and cilofexor were approximately dose proportional in the dose ranges of 30‐200 mg and 30‐100 mg, respectively 11,12 ; both are highly bound (>99%) to plasma proteins 13,14 . Human mass balance study data from healthy participants have shown that the primary pathway of elimination is hepatic metabolism (>90% of dose recovered in feces) for both firsocostat and cilofexor (including their major metabolites: GS‐834773 for firsocostat and GS‐716070 and GS‐1056756 for cilofexor), while renal elimination is considered a minor pathway (<3% of dose recovered in urine) (unpublished cilofexor data, Gilead Sciences, Inc.) 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For NASH patients who received the 100 mg dose of Cilofexor, 39% showed ≥30% decline in magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), while only 14% of patients who received the 30 mg dose showed the same level of MRI-PDFF reduction [ 44 ]. Additionally, Cilofexor (GS-9674) is under evaluation in phase 2 clinical trials for treatment of NASH (NCT02781584) in combination with Firsocostat (GS-0976) and Selonsertib (GS-4997) [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Nuclear Receptor Targets For Nafldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Px-104 (GS-9674, also called cilofexor) was considered as the best example of FXR agonist in the clinical development derivative. A single 100 -mg dose of cilofexor showed good tolerance in healthy volunteers and no grade 3 adverse effects were observed ( Nelson et al, 2017 ). A Phase II trial with Px-104 (NCT01999101) was also conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Px-104 in NAFLD patients.…”
Section: Fxr Modulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%