1993
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.170.245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Succinylcholine in Man.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, data from the user-defined approach (submodel 1) were supportive of an extremely fast SUX degradation (data not shown). All existing publications dealing with the in vivo kinetics of SUX corroborate these, in part empirical, observations (1,5,7,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Also, data from the user-defined approach (submodel 1) were supportive of an extremely fast SUX degradation (data not shown). All existing publications dealing with the in vivo kinetics of SUX corroborate these, in part empirical, observations (1,5,7,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Even though this drug has been widely used since 1951 as a muscle relaxant for surgery, only one human pharmacokinetic study has been reported and it had a sensitivity of 2000 ng/ml (1). The monitoring of the in vivo disposition of SUX would provide valuable information about the doseeffect relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the framework of a two-compartment model [10], an extensive distribution of SUX has been reported, and may be seen as a contributing-if not the most dominantfactor influencing the initial decrease in plasma concentration of this substance [4,5,20]. The extent of SUX distribution, however, is hard to define, as analyte degradation in the central compartment (and most probably in the periphery as well) is likely to cause an underestimation of its true distribution volume [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of SUX distribution, however, is hard to define, as analyte degradation in the central compartment (and most probably in the periphery as well) is likely to cause an underestimation of its true distribution volume [10]. As a result thereof, but also depending on the applied kinetic model, extremely divergent steady state distribution volumes of SUX, i.e., 2.2 [4], 16.4 [20], and 39 ml/kg [10] were reported. Again, it has to be kept in mind that older studies may not accurately represent the conditions in vivo, which is why the work of Roy et al [10], being able to at least prove a dispersion of SUX in the entire intravascular space, seems most plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%