Pharmacokinetics of temafloxacin in humans after multiple oral doses

Abstract

The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerance of temafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, were evaluated in healthy volunteers. Temafloxacin was found to be well tolerated when administered orally every 12 h for 7 days at doses of 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 800 mg. Steady-state maximum and minimum concentrations in plasma were proportional to dose, averaging slightly over 1.0 and 0.5 microgram/ml/100 mg administered. Analyses of variance found no significant differences among the dosage groups in total apparent clearances (CLT/F), renal clearances (CLR), or nonrenal clearances, which averaged 197, 119, and 78 ml/min, respectively. The half-life increased slightly with dose, averaging 8.4 h overall. The extent of absorption of temafloxacin was quite reproducible, with day-to-day intrasubject variability in minima averaging under 10%. Renal glomerular filtration of unbound drug was the dominant elimination process; however, tubular secretion and reabsorption also appear to occur. Secretion was estimated to account for about 12% of CLT/F during a regimen of 600 mg every 12 h. CLR was relatively constant for urine flow rates above 1 ml/min, but reabsorption appeared to occur under low-flow conditions, resulting in day-versus-night differences in CLR. Intersubject variability in CLT/F over the eightfold range in dosage was only 20%, and 60% of this variance was accounted for by differences in body surface area (or lean body mass), concentration in plasma, and urine flow rate. Overall, it appears that the pharmacokinetics of temafloxacin are essentially linear, reproducible within a subject, and predictable among subjects.

Pharmacokinetics of Temafloxacin after Multiple Oral Administration

“…Study 1: This double-blind placebo-controlled randomised study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of oral temafloxacin 100, 200, 300, 400, 600 and 800mg, each administered to 6 volunteers every (q) 12h, or placebo (n = 4) for 6.5 days (Granneman et al 1991 c).…”