2016
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20151214-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacologic Vitreolysis in Vascular Diseases of the Retina

Abstract: Vascular diseases of the retina such as diabetic retinopathy and vascular occlusions account for a large proportion of visual morbidity and blindness worldwide. The role of vitreous in the pathogenesis of these conditions has been increasingly recognized. Despite advances in the surgical technique of pars plana vitrectomy, the use of intravitreal agents for the lysis of vitreous has received attention, guided largely by promising results from the trials involving patients with non-vascular retinal diseases suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there are very few published studies of biodistribution following intravitreal injection of AAV2 14,54‐56 . A time course that spans the peak effect is desirable, with at least one dose that is above the intended clinical dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there are very few published studies of biodistribution following intravitreal injection of AAV2 14,54‐56 . A time course that spans the peak effect is desirable, with at least one dose that is above the intended clinical dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are very few published studies of biodistribution following intravitreal injection of AAV2. 14 , 54 , 55 , 56 A time course that spans the peak effect is desirable, with at least one dose that is above the intended clinical dose. It is preferable that a quantitative PCR assay be used for assessment of vector biodistribution and is validated using PCR as demonstrated in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%