1975
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.115.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Analysis of Dopamine Action on the Isolated Dog Atrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study by use of isolated atria, we confirmed that dobutamine-induced positive chronotropic and inotropic effects were not modified by treatment with imipramine, although tyramine induced ones were markedly suppressed and dopamine-induced ones were slightly but significantly sup pressed as reported previously (9). Therefore, it was confirmed that dobutamine, unlike dopamine and tyramine, has no releasing action of norepinephrine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study by use of isolated atria, we confirmed that dobutamine-induced positive chronotropic and inotropic effects were not modified by treatment with imipramine, although tyramine induced ones were markedly suppressed and dopamine-induced ones were slightly but significantly sup pressed as reported previously (9). Therefore, it was confirmed that dobutamine, unlike dopamine and tyramine, has no releasing action of norepinephrine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, an intra-arterial injection of dobutamine to the isolated atrium caused more potent chrono tropic and inotropic effects than that of dopamine, with essentially the same pattern of response as that to isoproterenol. In isolated atrial preparations, the ratio of the inotropic effect to the chronotropic effect for each dose of the drugs was studied in our previous reports (7)(8)(9)(10). Figure 7 shows the ratio for dobutamine determined in the present study as well as the ratios for other drugs determined in both present and previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%