2008
DOI: 10.1002/9783527621460.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological and Regulatory Aspects of QT Prolongation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational methods like in silico modeling, molecular docking, and dynamic simulation could be particularly valuable in such cases. positive hERG liability [24,25]. However, in silico tools remain to be of great help in filtering out these compounds and, thus, have reduced the incidence of potent hERG blockers in industrial drug discovery programs [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational methods like in silico modeling, molecular docking, and dynamic simulation could be particularly valuable in such cases. positive hERG liability [24,25]. However, in silico tools remain to be of great help in filtering out these compounds and, thus, have reduced the incidence of potent hERG blockers in industrial drug discovery programs [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Ponti described the pharmacological and regulatory aspects of QT prolongation, and pointed out that hERG inhibition is a necessary, but not sufficient, cause for drug-induced TdP: drugs that prolong QT interval are hERG inhibitors, but several hERG inhibitors do not prolong the QT interval. 71 A major risk factor is the coadministration with inhibitors of metabolizing enzymes, which may increase the exposure of hERG inhibitors by decreasing their metabolism. Indeed, this mechanism initially led to the withdrawal of terfenadine, and later on of other hERG inhibitors, from the market.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TdP related cardiac events and fatalities were generally observed after overdosing or after “unpredictable” changes in plasma drug concentrations triggered by drug–drug interactions. De Ponti described the pharmacological and regulatory aspects of QT prolongation, and pointed out that hERG inhibition is a necessary, but not sufficient, cause for drug-induced TdP: drugs that prolong QT interval are hERG inhibitors, but several hERG inhibitors do not prolong the QT interval . A major risk factor is the coadministration with inhibitors of metabolizing enzymes, which may increase the exposure of hERG inhibitors by decreasing their metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulatory landscape to date has unquestionably been successful in one important regard: no drug with unanticipated liability for TdP has entered the market since its implementation. However, de Ponti estimated that “as many as 60% of new molecular entities developed as potential therapeutic agents, when assayed for I Kr blocking liability, test positive and are thus abandoned early in development.” This is unfortunate because, in some cases, a sufficient margin exists between therapeutic plasma concentrations and the concentrations that cause I Kr blockade and blockade of different channels may lead to lack of proarrhythmic risk, even to antiarrhythmic properties (eg, amiodarone, ranolazine). Verapamil, a potent I Kr blocker, does not cause QTc prolongation (except possibly at very high intravenous exposures), likely because it blocks calcium current as well.…”
Section: Potential Future Modifications To the Regulatory Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%