2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological characterization of mono-, dual- and tri-peptidic agonists at GIP and GLP-1 receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To exclude possible anomalous pharmacology by the artificial nature of the complementation assay, additional independent techniques were used and showed an equivalent pharmacological profile for tirzepatide recruitment of ARRB1 and ARRB2 at both the human and mouse GLP-1R ( Supplemental Figure 2 ). These findings are generally consistent with results recently reported by Yuliantie et al ( 24 ). In our studies, despite exhibiting low efficacy, the relative potency of tirzepatide for arrestin recruitment correlates well with binding affinity ( Supplemental Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…To exclude possible anomalous pharmacology by the artificial nature of the complementation assay, additional independent techniques were used and showed an equivalent pharmacological profile for tirzepatide recruitment of ARRB1 and ARRB2 at both the human and mouse GLP-1R ( Supplemental Figure 2 ). These findings are generally consistent with results recently reported by Yuliantie et al ( 24 ). In our studies, despite exhibiting low efficacy, the relative potency of tirzepatide for arrestin recruitment correlates well with binding affinity ( Supplemental Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Whilst GLP-1R agonists developed specifically to G protein-directed signalling are yet to be tested in humans, the potential utility of this approach is supported by the recent observation that Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonist peptide currently in late stage clinical trials (18), and its non-acylated precursor show a significant degree of bias at the GLP-1R in favour of cAMP over β-arrestin recruitment (19,73). Conflicting reports exist for bias between cAMP and βarrestin recruitment to the GIPR for Tirzepatide, with one study showing bias in favour of cAMP and another showing no difference (19,74). Biased agonism at the GCGR is relatively unexplored, except for a recent study of a series of dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonists in which small response amplitude for β-arrestin-2 recruitment to GCGR hampered bias assessments (75), but should be further explored in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both also showed significantly reduced recruitment of β -arrestin-2 to GCGR compared to glucagon, a difference that was larger than the GCGR efficacy reduction seen with SRB103Q compared to SRB103H. Thus, cotadutide and SAR425899 may well be additional examples of incretin receptor ligands retrospectively identified as showing biased agonist properties, as was recently found for the dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonist tirzepatide [71,72]. On the other hand, the recorded cAMP potencies for cotadutide and SAR425899 in the study of Darbalaei et al relative to the endogenous comparator ligands are orders of magnitude less than reported previously [70,73], raising the possibility that the cellular systems used to evaluate the pharmacology of these ligands could have affected the results.…”
Section: Improved Anti-hyperglycaemic Efficacy Of Srb103q Is Preserved With Chronic Administrationmentioning
confidence: 73%