2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.686461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Inactivation of CatSper Blocks Sperm Fertilizing Ability Independently of the Capacitation Status of the Cells: Implications for Non-hormonal Contraception

Abstract: Cation channel of sperm (CatSper), the main sperm-specific Ca2+ channel, plays a key role in mammalian fertilization, and it is essential for male fertility, becoming an attractive target for contraception. Based on this, in the present work, we investigated the effects of CatSper inactivation on in vitro and in vivo sperm fertilizing ability and the mechanisms underlying such effects. Exposure of cauda epididymal mouse sperm to different concentrations (1–20 μM) of the potent CatSper inhibitor HC-056456 (HC) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most studied tool compounds to explore CatSper physiology and pharmacology are the T-type CCBs mibefradil (Strunker et al, 2011) and NNC55-0396 ( Lishko et al, 2011 ). These and other reported CatSper inhibitors, including HC-056456 ( Curci et al, 2021 ), MDL12330A ( Brenker et al, 2012 ) and RU1968 ( Rennhack et al, 2018 ), also inhibit the sperm-specific K + channel Slo3 with similar potencies, although RU1968 appears to be the most selective for CatSper over Slo3 ( Rennhack et al, 2018 ). In addition, the two structurally related T-type CCBs produce an anomalous calcium influx at elevated concentrations (Strunker et al, 2011), are not selective for CatSper over Ca v 3.1, Ca v 3.2, and Ca v 3.3 T-type calcium channels ( Martin et al, 2000 ) and display cytotoxic effects in sperm ( Tamburrino et al, 2014 ), fibroblasts (unpublished observations), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( Lijnen et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most studied tool compounds to explore CatSper physiology and pharmacology are the T-type CCBs mibefradil (Strunker et al, 2011) and NNC55-0396 ( Lishko et al, 2011 ). These and other reported CatSper inhibitors, including HC-056456 ( Curci et al, 2021 ), MDL12330A ( Brenker et al, 2012 ) and RU1968 ( Rennhack et al, 2018 ), also inhibit the sperm-specific K + channel Slo3 with similar potencies, although RU1968 appears to be the most selective for CatSper over Slo3 ( Rennhack et al, 2018 ). In addition, the two structurally related T-type CCBs produce an anomalous calcium influx at elevated concentrations (Strunker et al, 2011), are not selective for CatSper over Ca v 3.1, Ca v 3.2, and Ca v 3.3 T-type calcium channels ( Martin et al, 2000 ) and display cytotoxic effects in sperm ( Tamburrino et al, 2014 ), fibroblasts (unpublished observations), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( Lijnen et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Indeed, in certain infertility cases, sperm from otherwise healthy men failed to respond to a PROG stimulus ( Smith et al, 2013 ). This observation validated the hypothesis that compounds able to prevent PROG-induced influx of Ca 2+ by CatSper could serve as contraceptives, which is strengthened by the finding that the CatSper inhibitor HC-056456 greatly reduced both in vitro and in vivo fertilization in mice ( Curci et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Intrauterine insemination assays were performed as previously described ( Curci et al, 2021 ). Briefly, female mice were superovulated by an injection of eCG, followed by hCG 46 h later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not observed when CatSper is absent (CatSper1 KO), in which a population of sperm with high DiSC 3 (5) fluorescence remained detectable after EGTA addition ( Figures 2A–C ). Similarly, pharmacological inhibition of CatSper using HC-056456 or RU 1968 ( Rennhack et al, 2018 ; Curci et al, 2021 ) (two well characterized CatSper inhibitors), also prevented the EGTA-induced depolarization ( Figures 2D–F ). This pharmacological approach was also tested using two different mouse strains, C57BL/6 and hybrid F1 (BALB/c female × C57BL/6 male), and no relevant differences were found ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%