2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012187.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological interventions for painful sickle cell vaso-occlusive crises in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several systematic reviews have been published over the past years in the field of SCD to assess analgesic intervention [26][27][28] or transfusion therapy efficacy 29 in the setting of VOC or ACS. Two recent studies reported a descriptive review, assessing available evidence in favor and against the use of corticosteroids therapy, but without meta-analysis 30,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several systematic reviews have been published over the past years in the field of SCD to assess analgesic intervention [26][27][28] or transfusion therapy efficacy 29 in the setting of VOC or ACS. Two recent studies reported a descriptive review, assessing available evidence in favor and against the use of corticosteroids therapy, but without meta-analysis 30,31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limited our search to non-opioid analgesics that have established use in other painful conditions and are accessible and used with some frequency within SCD clinical practice. 27 , 60 , 61 Although non-pharmacological interventions are an important component of multimodal pain management, such interventions were not included in our literature search for the following reasons: 1) these interventions are usually inaccessible in the acute clinical setting for management of acute SCD pain, 2) sickle cell providers lack familiarity with these interventions, and 3) the evidence for these interventions for acute SCD pain is sparse. 27 , 60 , 62 , 63 In addition, because this review is focused on acute SCD pain, non-opioid adjuncts, such as antidepressants, which may be used in the outpatient setting for chronic SCD pain 61 were not included in our literature search.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 27 , 60 , 61 Although non-pharmacological interventions are an important component of multimodal pain management, such interventions were not included in our literature search for the following reasons: 1) these interventions are usually inaccessible in the acute clinical setting for management of acute SCD pain, 2) sickle cell providers lack familiarity with these interventions, and 3) the evidence for these interventions for acute SCD pain is sparse. 27 , 60 , 62 , 63 In addition, because this review is focused on acute SCD pain, non-opioid adjuncts, such as antidepressants, which may be used in the outpatient setting for chronic SCD pain 61 were not included in our literature search. Based on these considerations, our list of non-opioid analgesic adjuncts was narrowed to intravenous acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ketamine, anticonvulsants (gabapentin and pregabalin) and lidocaine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El manejo de las crisis vasooclusivas dolorosas incluye intervenciones farmacológicas como opioides, analgésicos no opioides, medicamentos en combinación, oxigenación e hidratación (41). Las intervenciones no farmacológicas, como el entrenamiento físico de resistencia, han mostrado efectos benéficos en la red capilar muscular de pacientes con anemia de células falciformes, por lo que teóricamente podría aportar al manejo y prevención de estas crisis (42).…”
Section: Tratamientounclassified