1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.1996.tb00222.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Profile and Therapeutic Perspectives of Semotiadil Fumarate (SD‐3211), a Novel Benzothiazine Ca2+ Antagonist

Abstract: Antagonist--Ca2+ Channel-Semotiadil. Semotiadil fumarate {( + )-(R)-32-[5-methoxy-2-[3-[methy1[2-[3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenoxy]-ethyl]amino]propoxy]phenyl-W-1,4-benzothiazin-3(4H)-one hydrogen fumarate, or SD-321 l}, shown in Fig. 1, is a novel Ca2+ antagonist with a benzothiazine ring (8,26). Semotiadil exerts potent and long-lasting Ca'+ antagonistic actions, as shown by the results of in vitro and in vivo experiments. Semotiadil had intermediate tissue selectivities:it is more vasoselective than diltiazem an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hill slopes of the binding inhibition were 0.94–1.0 in cardiac channels, indicating no apparent allosteric interaction between PN200‐110 (isradipine) and semotiadil. This is in clear contrast to observations in the skeletal channel [20–22], in which semotiadil has a negative allosteric interaction with DHP, PAA and BTZ. The negative allosteric interaction was confirmed in the present work and the Hill slopes obtained were 0.63–0.67, similar to a previous report [21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hill slopes of the binding inhibition were 0.94–1.0 in cardiac channels, indicating no apparent allosteric interaction between PN200‐110 (isradipine) and semotiadil. This is in clear contrast to observations in the skeletal channel [20–22], in which semotiadil has a negative allosteric interaction with DHP, PAA and BTZ. The negative allosteric interaction was confirmed in the present work and the Hill slopes obtained were 0.63–0.67, similar to a previous report [21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the Hill slope, 1.0 and 0.97 were obtained for semotiadil and D51‐4700 in the cardiac membranes, respectively, and 0.63 and 0.67 in the skeletal muscle membranes, suggesting no apparent allosteric interactions exist between the semotiadil analogs and PN200‐110 in the cardiac membranes but negative allosteric interactions operate in the skeletal muscle membranes. The IC 50 (2.0 μM) and Hill slope (0.63) of semotiadil for the skeletal membranes are close to the reported values in canine skeletal membranes (5.4 μM and 0.57, respectively) [21, 22]. As reference, (±)PN200‐110 inhibition in the cardiac and skeletal muscle membranes is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is no apparent similarity in the orientation of the side chains as well as in the common methoxyphenyl group between two drugs, when the phenyl ring of the benzothiazepine and 1,4-benzothiazine are overlaid by the computer. The hypothesis that the long side chain at the C-3 position of the 1,4-benzothiazine ring is a part of the pharmacophore for calcium antagonist activity (13) is supported by the fact that a similar structural component: Ar-C(R 1 R 2 )-CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -N(Me)-CH 2 CH 2 -Ar exists in verapamil and other PAAs. It is apparent that the 1,4-benzothiazine ring of semotiadil plays an additional role that contributes to the enhanced potency.…”
Section: Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%