1991
DOI: 10.1254/jjp.55.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Studies on Lappaconitine: Antinociception and Inhibition of the Spinal Action of Substance P and Somatostatin.

Abstract: ABSTRACT-The pain response of mice to an injection of 0.5% formalin into the dorsal surface of a hindpaw is biphasic, with a first phase lasting for 5 min and a second phase lasting from 10 to 30 min post-injection. Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of [D-Pro2, D-Trp7'9]-substance P inhibited the first phase, and i.t. cysteamine inhibited the second phase. Lappaconitine (LA) and morphine (MOR) inhibited both phases equally in a dose-dependent manner. Diclofenac inhibited both phases, but the second phase was inhibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and i.t. injection of LA produces dose-dependent antinociception (13); and LA may act supra spinally to inhibit the spinal nociceptive trans mission (3). In the present study, s.c. and i.c.v.-administered LA-induced antinocicep tion was markedly reduced after spinalization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and i.t. injection of LA produces dose-dependent antinociception (13); and LA may act supra spinally to inhibit the spinal nociceptive trans mission (3). In the present study, s.c. and i.c.v.-administered LA-induced antinocicep tion was markedly reduced after spinalization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Furthermore, we re ported that a supraspinal-spinal interaction was important for the production of the anti nociceptive action of systemically administered LA (2) and that LA acted at the supraspinal level to inhibit nociceptive transmission or to block the spinal action of nociceptive neuro transmitters via the descending pathways (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the mode of action, we proved lappaconitine to be antinociceptive with an ED 50 of 2.7 mg/kg (i.v. ), a value close to that (2.5 mg/kg, s.c., mice) of Ono and Satoh (1991). Although the ED 50 and LD 50 values calculated for the antinociceptive properties and acute toxicity of lappaconitine were about 100-fold higher than those of aconitine, the affinity of lappaconitine (K i 11.5 µM) for site II was only 10 times lower than that of aconitine (K i 1.4 µM).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Formalininduced release of substance P into the dorsal horn parallels behavioral nociceptive responses and electrical activity of dorsal horn neurons (38)(39)(40)(41), suggesting that substance P may be important in the transmission of the nociceptive signal. On the other hand, tachykinin receptor antagonists have not consistently shown a clear involvement of substance P in formalin-induced pain; some investigators found antagonisteffects primarily during the early phase (42,43), while others found effects during the late phase (44-47), or both phases (48,49). The interpretation of the pharmacological data is further complicated by the fact that some antagonists exhibit NK1 receptor independent effects (50) and may also affect motor behaviors that can interfere with the behavioral test (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%