2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12281-009-0011-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacology, in vitro activity, and in vivo efficacy of new antifungal agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical diversity and known safety profiles of drugs in these libraries (with most having been previously tested in humans) make this a particularly appealing approach with the potential to rapidly advance a candidate into the clinic. To address the shortage of antifungal drugs, particularly those with anti-biofilm activity [ 3 , 24 ], we screened the Repurposing Hub library provided by the Broad Institute [ 16 ] in search for inhibitors of biofilm formation of C. albicans strain SC5314 and C. auris strain 0390. Each of the approximately 6000 compounds in the library, which includes FDA-approved drugs and compounds at different stages of clinical trials [ 16 ], was screened at a final concentration of 20 μM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The chemical diversity and known safety profiles of drugs in these libraries (with most having been previously tested in humans) make this a particularly appealing approach with the potential to rapidly advance a candidate into the clinic. To address the shortage of antifungal drugs, particularly those with anti-biofilm activity [ 3 , 24 ], we screened the Repurposing Hub library provided by the Broad Institute [ 16 ] in search for inhibitors of biofilm formation of C. albicans strain SC5314 and C. auris strain 0390. Each of the approximately 6000 compounds in the library, which includes FDA-approved drugs and compounds at different stages of clinical trials [ 16 ], was screened at a final concentration of 20 μM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But perhaps most interesting is the fact that BAY 11-7082 seems to display potent activity also against all species of filamentous fungi tested, including the Mucorales (both Rhizopus and Mucor species), Aspergillus spp., Scedosporium spp., Lomentospora prolificans , Fusarium spp., Alternaria , Curvularia, and Exserohilum spp., with MICs which, in most instances, compared quite favorably with their corresponding MIC values for voriconazole and/or posaconazole. Of note, infections caused by non-Aspergillus molds are becoming increasingly frequent and are difficult to treat, as many of these species are remarkably recalcitrant to most current existing antifungals, often leading to very poor outcomes in patients suffering from these devastating infections [ 24 ]. As such, developing antifungals with activity against these filamentous fungi represents one of the most pressing needs in the field of medical mycology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal features of antifungal agents should be fungicidal and should provide options for combination antifungal use, with a favorable pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamics profile. Moreover, agents should present a few drug-drug interactions and be administered via both the oral and iv routes [34]. Until recently, there has been no new class of antifungal drugs discovered in over 40 years, and no new class brought into practice since the echinocandins in 2006 [35].…”
Section: Traditional and New Therapeutic Approaches And Mechanism Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%