Background
Effective sedation is paramount in the care of critically ill patients.
Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2- adrenergic receptor agonist, is an agent that is
being increasingly used in the ICU despite its variability of patient response.
Objective
To report dexmedetomidine effectiveness and to identify specific patient
characteristics that play a role in the achievement of adequate sedation with
dexmedetomidine.
Methods
We conducted a 6 month, pilot, prospective observational study in a medical
intensive care unit (MICU) at an academic medical center. Patients receiving
dexmedetomidine were followed until drug discontinuation and were grouped into
non-responders and responders. Effective sedation was defined as the achievement of a
Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) score of 3-4 after the addition of dexmedetomidine.
Patient characteristics, laboratory values, home and inpatient medications, and
dexmedetomidine dosing information were collected to identify predictors of clinical
response.
Results
Thirty eight patients received dexmedetomidine in a 6 month time period, with
dexmedetomidine being ineffective in 19/38 (50%) patients, effective in 11/38 (28.95%)
patients, and effectiveness was unable to be assessed in 8 patients due to clinical
confounders. Based upon the standard multiple logistic regression analysis, patients
with a lower APACHE II (β coefficient −0.24; 95% CI, −0.39 to
−0.03) and patients that received home antidepressants (β coefficient
2.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 4.43) were more likely to achieve successful sedation with
dexmedetomidine as compared to patients with a higher APACHE II score or no home
antidepressant use.
Conclusions
Variability in effective sedation occurred with dexmedetomidine use. Future
large scale investigations should be conducted to confirm the association of a lower
APACHE II score and home antidepressant use and dexmedetomidine effectiveness.