2005
DOI: 10.2174/138955705774329519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacophore Identification for Sigma-1 (σ1) Receptor Binding: Application of the "Deconstruction - Reconstruction - Elaboration" Approach

Abstract: At least two different types of sigma (sigma1 and sigma2) receptors have been identified. A structural feature common to high-affinity (Ki <10 nM) sigma1 ligands is: C-N(R)-X-Ph; both C and Ph are associated with regions of bulk tolerance. Numerous other ligands bind, but typically do so with lower affinity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
115
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The butylene intermediate chain determines the optimal distance between the primary B and secondary A hydrophobic centers proposed by the Glennon's model. [34][35][36] The compound with the highest affinity is the butylene derivative 3a (R = H), with K i (σ 1 ) value of 2.6 nM and an interesting selectivity ratio K i (σ 2 )/K i (σ 1 ) = 46.2. The para-substituted compound 3d (R=4-Cl), instead, still maintains an appreciable σ 1 affinity but has a selectivity ratio (K i (σ 2 )/K i (σ 1 )=5.1) lower than those of the unsubstituted derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 The butylene intermediate chain determines the optimal distance between the primary B and secondary A hydrophobic centers proposed by the Glennon's model. [34][35][36] The compound with the highest affinity is the butylene derivative 3a (R = H), with K i (σ 1 ) value of 2.6 nM and an interesting selectivity ratio K i (σ 2 )/K i (σ 1 ) = 46.2. The para-substituted compound 3d (R=4-Cl), instead, still maintains an appreciable σ 1 affinity but has a selectivity ratio (K i (σ 2 )/K i (σ 1 )=5.1) lower than those of the unsubstituted derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a propyl or butyl chain is dictated by the fact that both fall within the range of optimal distances between the basic nitrogen atom and hydrophobic primary site in the receptor model of Glennon. [34][35][36] All compounds obtained were subsequently tested in order to assess their affinity and their selectivity toward σ receptors. As mentioned previously, the crystal structure of both σ 1 and σ 2 receptors remains unsolved to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable history of the S1R extends from the late 1970s and early 1980s (Martin et al, 1976;Su, 1981Su, , 1988Tam, 1983;Vaupel, 1983;Tam and Cook, 1984;Largent et al, 1986Largent et al, , 1987Sircar et al, 1986a;Weber et al, 1986;Itzhak, 1987;McLean and Weber, 1988;Sharkey et al, 1988;Bowen et al, 1989;de Costa et al, 1989;Hellewell and Bowen, 1990) to the present day. The reader is directed to the earlier publications and reviews that outline the original pharmacologic identification of this important receptor (Martin, 1983;Su and Hayashi, 2003;Glennon, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the C and aromatic moiety (Ph) from the pharmacophore are located in areas of bulky hydrophobic tolerance. 25 This presence of two hydrophobic pockets may accommodate several binding modes for a single compound. 25,26 From the current study, it can be extrapolated that the polycyclic cage may prove useful in future studies to delineate binding to these two hydrophobic pockets, and therefore binding modes, as compared to the use of only aromatic rings as seen in many of the compounds published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%