2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacophore modeling studies of type I and type II kinase inhibitors of Tie2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a feature is actually found in the fluorescein scaffold and in our pharmacophore model. [84][85][86][87] However pharmacophore models of kinase inhibitors are also characterized by at least one hydrogen bond donor or acceptor not present in our model, therefore supporting the hypothesis of an allosteric binding site. We could also envisage a possible interaction of RB with other proteins that take part in the transport of neurotransmitters and are present in the system such as chloride, potassium channels or kinase such as pyruvate kinase 88 or phosphodiesterase.…”
Section: Vmat2 and Vacht Pharmacologysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Such a feature is actually found in the fluorescein scaffold and in our pharmacophore model. [84][85][86][87] However pharmacophore models of kinase inhibitors are also characterized by at least one hydrogen bond donor or acceptor not present in our model, therefore supporting the hypothesis of an allosteric binding site. We could also envisage a possible interaction of RB with other proteins that take part in the transport of neurotransmitters and are present in the system such as chloride, potassium channels or kinase such as pyruvate kinase 88 or phosphodiesterase.…”
Section: Vmat2 and Vacht Pharmacologysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A simpler four-feature model was used to discuss Type II inhibitors by Backes et al [5], resolving ligands into hinge, DFG, Glu-Lys and deep pocket binding components. Quantitative pharmacophore models were developed by Xie et al [14], specifically for Type I and Type II Tie2 protein kinase inhibitors (Tie2 is closely related to VEG-FR-2). Here, a five-feature model was found sufficient to explain Type II Tie2 inhibition, with the additional use of two excluded volume constraints (in the HM region).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various attempts have been made to qualitatively rationalize the broad structural features that govern Type II protein kinase inhibitor binding [5,[13][14][15]. For example, Backes et al [5] resolved inhibitor features into four groups, which interact with the hinge region, the DFG loop, a Glu-Lys pair and the deep pocket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them contain a hydrogen bond donor-acceptor pair (urea or amide) and a hydrophobic moiety that forms van der Waals interactions with the allosteric site. Moreover, they have a group that forms one or two hydrogen bonds with the kinase hinge region [20].…”
Section: Dfg-motif Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%