2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacy services and role development in UK general practice: a cross-sectional survey

Abstract: Background The ‘Clinical Pharmacists in General Practice’ (CPGP) pilot provided a template for general practice pharmacy professionals’ (GPPPs) roles encouraging NHS England to fund >2000 practice-based pharmacists. However, many GPPPs work outside the CPGP initiative and little is known about the services they provide. Objectives To explore services provided by all UK GPPPs (pharmacists/pharmacy technicians), includin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the various clinical activities undertaken by GP pharmacists across England, medication reviews and medicine reconciliation remained as major part of their roles. These findings are consistent with the previous studies that evaluated pharmacists’ role within the pilot scheme [ 13 , 17 ] or across the UK [ 25 , 26 ]. A recent review from multiple countries and contexts conducted to inform the development of a comprehensive role description for practice pharmacists has detailed seven role sub-categories (medication management, patient examination and screening, chronic disease management, drug information and education, collaboration and liaison, audit and quality assurance and research) [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the various clinical activities undertaken by GP pharmacists across England, medication reviews and medicine reconciliation remained as major part of their roles. These findings are consistent with the previous studies that evaluated pharmacists’ role within the pilot scheme [ 13 , 17 ] or across the UK [ 25 , 26 ]. A recent review from multiple countries and contexts conducted to inform the development of a comprehensive role description for practice pharmacists has detailed seven role sub-categories (medication management, patient examination and screening, chronic disease management, drug information and education, collaboration and liaison, audit and quality assurance and research) [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A recent review from multiple countries and contexts conducted to inform the development of a comprehensive role description for practice pharmacists has detailed seven role sub-categories (medication management, patient examination and screening, chronic disease management, drug information and education, collaboration and liaison, audit and quality assurance and research) [ 32 ]. Over 80% of responding pharmacists were IPs with scope of practice mainly in hypertension, diabetes and respiratory diseases similar to other studies [ 17 , 25 , 26 ]. This may reflects the significant funding provided for pharmacists across the UK to be prescribers and practice in the primary care settings [ 18 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could additionally expedite the adoption of services in areas where pharmacists are not yet available to support general practice owing to recruitment issues for the pharmacy profession in general practice. 28 , 29 Taking a team approach with the training and implementation of PSI-based interventions importantly builds sustainability by not relying on particular individuals for the sustainability of the intervention by spreading ownership across healthcare professions. 30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores for the following CCS elements will be computed at the baseline and 12 months: professional interactions (range 1-4), relationship initiation (range 1-5), exchange characteristics (role specification and trustworthiness; range 1-5), and commitment to collaboration (range 1-5). The Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon-signed rank test, or Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, as appropriate, will be used to assess the differences in CCS variables within and between different participant groups at baseline and 12 months [70,71]. Total scores for TES will be calculated for the participant groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%