2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-019-00833-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacy-supported interventions at transitions of care: an umbrella review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the proportion of patients with at least one clinically important medication error at hospital discharge was 6-fold lower in the intervention group (9.3%) than in the control group (61.9%; p < 0.001), and, after adjustment for other patient and hospitalization characteristics, patients in the intervention group benefited from a 20-fold reduction in the risk of a clinically important medication error (multiple logistic regression, Table 3 ). Our results are consistent with those of previous studies that have repeatedly shown that pharmacist-led interventions reduce medication discrepancies and medication errors at transitions of care and are among the ones showing the greatest impact ( Nickerson et al, 2005 ; Mueller et al, 2012 ; Ensing et al, 2015 ; Michaelsen et al, 2015 ; Cheema et al, 2018 ; Lipovec et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the proportion of patients with at least one clinically important medication error at hospital discharge was 6-fold lower in the intervention group (9.3%) than in the control group (61.9%; p < 0.001), and, after adjustment for other patient and hospitalization characteristics, patients in the intervention group benefited from a 20-fold reduction in the risk of a clinically important medication error (multiple logistic regression, Table 3 ). Our results are consistent with those of previous studies that have repeatedly shown that pharmacist-led interventions reduce medication discrepancies and medication errors at transitions of care and are among the ones showing the greatest impact ( Nickerson et al, 2005 ; Mueller et al, 2012 ; Ensing et al, 2015 ; Michaelsen et al, 2015 ; Cheema et al, 2018 ; Lipovec et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The findings from the included articles showed that many different pharmacist interventions have been explored, for example medication reconciliation in healthcare transitions, medication review, patient counselling and follow-up. 29 46 The literature reviews showed positive effects on medication discrepancies, DRPs, potential adverse drug events and hospital revisits related to adverse drug events; 31 , 34 , 39 , 40 however, no single preferred, effective pharmacist-led intervention or a consensus for best practice has been identified. 40 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings from the included articles showed that many different pharmacist interventions have been explored, for example medication reconciliation in healthcare transitions, medication review, patient counselling and followup. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] The literature reviews showed positive effects on medication discrepancies, DRPs, potential adverse drug events and hospital revisits related to adverse drug events; 31,34,39,40 however, no single preferred, effective pharmacist-led intervention or a consensus for best practice has been identified. 40 Medication-related pharmacist interventions in GP were most effective when they were multifaceted and involved patient follow-up and interdisciplinary collaboration with face-to-face communication.…”
Section: Development Of the Intervention Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other reviews highlight the high heterogeneity between studies makes it difficult to assess the impact of a single clinical pharmacist activity on patient clinical outcomes, such as medication reconciliation, or medication review. 18 , 20 , 23 , 98 , 100 , 101 , 103 This is mainly due to the variability in use of different terms and lack of definition of these activities in the study methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%