2000
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharyngolaryngeal, Neck, and Jaw Discomfort after Anesthesia with the Face Mask and Laryngeal Mask Airway at High and Low Cuff Volumes in Males and Females

Abstract: The LMA causes more sore throat and dysphagia but less jaw pain than the FM. Sore throat and dysphagia are more common with the LMA if the initial cuff volume is high. There are no differences in discomfort levels between males and females. However, these discomforts do not influence patient satisfaction after LMA or FM anesthesia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The insertion of an LMA may result in laryngeal injury such as oedema of the peripheral receptors of the afferent reflex arc [12]. Increased intracuff pressure, as well as the use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, could affect laryngeal soft tissue [20,21], and Tanaka et al [12] have shown depression of defensive reflexes over a period of time when an LMA is in situ. However, the measurements in our study were performed immediately following induction of anaesthesia; care was taken to apply low cuff pressures [22] and all patients were breathing spontaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insertion of an LMA may result in laryngeal injury such as oedema of the peripheral receptors of the afferent reflex arc [12]. Increased intracuff pressure, as well as the use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, could affect laryngeal soft tissue [20,21], and Tanaka et al [12] have shown depression of defensive reflexes over a period of time when an LMA is in situ. However, the measurements in our study were performed immediately following induction of anaesthesia; care was taken to apply low cuff pressures [22] and all patients were breathing spontaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79,80 Contributing factors include device type and size, insertion technique, and cuff pressure. [81][82][83][84][85] Proactive measurement and reduction of cuff pressures to Ͻ 60 cm H 2 O have been shown to reduce the incidence of sore throat. 82 Tongue congestion and edema may occur if the SAD is not inserted deeply enough or the cuff is overinflated.…”
Section: Airway Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inserting an upper airway device which would maintain airway patency while facilitating tracheal intubation seemed a safer approach than use of the fibrescope alone. Inserting a classic, or intubating laryngeal mask airway (cLMA, ILMA, Intavent Orthofix, Maidenhead, UK) might have been hindered by the acute angle between the oral cavity and the laryngopharynx [2] and several difficulties intubating through cLMAs have been described [3]. The correlation between a good fibreoptic laryngeal view through a ProSeal LMA (PLMA, Intavent Orthofix), and ease of gastric tube insertion through the PLMA's oesophageal port suggested that a PLMA might enable intubation if correctly positioned at the upper oesophageal sphincter [4].…”
Section: Use Of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway As a Dedicated Airway Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relocation was confirmed with an orthopantomogram. Use of a laryngeal mask airway predisposes to pharyngolaryngeal trauma [1], sore throat and dysphagia [2], but has not previously been reported to be associated with bilateral TMJ dislocation. There are, however, several reports of bilateral TMJ dislocation associated with anaesthesia [3,4].…”
Section: Use Of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway As a Dedicated Airway Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation