2004
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2004.829277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-agile branch-line couplers using metamaterial lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we define the enhancement of power density at broadside of the antenna as the ratio between its maximum power density radiated at broadside and the power density radiated at broadside by a unit amplitude electric line source in free space [which is equal to ], we have (25) Therefore, the enhancement-fractional-bandwidth product EFBW at broadside is (26) This means that, by letting the normalized attenuation constant have small values (e.g., through the use of thick slabs), a large radiated power density at broadside (25) can be obtained, but at the expense of having a very small fractional bandwidth (24). Note that the enhancement factor increases as decreases, though the bandwidth FBW decreases even faster.…”
Section: A Leaky-wave Explanation Of the Optimum Radiation Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we define the enhancement of power density at broadside of the antenna as the ratio between its maximum power density radiated at broadside and the power density radiated at broadside by a unit amplitude electric line source in free space [which is equal to ], we have (25) Therefore, the enhancement-fractional-bandwidth product EFBW at broadside is (26) This means that, by letting the normalized attenuation constant have small values (e.g., through the use of thick slabs), a large radiated power density at broadside (25) can be obtained, but at the expense of having a very small fractional bandwidth (24). Note that the enhancement factor increases as decreases, though the bandwidth FBW decreases even faster.…”
Section: A Leaky-wave Explanation Of the Optimum Radiation Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is more than a 70% reduction in size when compared to the branch-line coupler using microstrip lines with the same substrate setup. The overall size reduction is comparable to the branch-line couplers using composite right/left-handed (CRLH) metamaterial transmission lines [27], [28]. The full-wave simulation results of a microstrip branch-line coupler and a miniaturized EBG-based coupler are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Design Examples As a Branch-line Coupler Based On The Quamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since the early 2000s, various microwave engineering applications of the LH concept have been proposed in the literature [65][66][67][68]. So, innovative microwave devices (filter, antenna, power divider, coupler…) were designed [65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Lc-effect Cancellation With Lh Active Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, innovative microwave devices (filter, antenna, power divider, coupler…) were designed [65][66][67][68]. At the beginning, the LH-circuits were inspired thanks to the analogy with the metamaterials susceptible to operate with negative phase-and/or group-velocities [69][70][71].…”
Section: Lc-effect Cancellation With Lh Active Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%