2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2019.8810723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Balancing in Power Distribution Systems: A heuristic approach based on group-theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This same year, it was proposed to minimize the imbalance in distribution systems employing a heuristic search algorithm that generated an optimal system phase shift using contactors for the loads [27]. A year later, it was implemented in coding based on group theory to minimize power losses in distribution systems through a genetic algorithm [28]. Other algorithms aiming at minimizing power losses have been developed to date, such as the analytical approach algorithms, which perform a minimum base exchange [29].…”
Section: Review Of the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same year, it was proposed to minimize the imbalance in distribution systems employing a heuristic search algorithm that generated an optimal system phase shift using contactors for the loads [27]. A year later, it was implemented in coding based on group theory to minimize power losses in distribution systems through a genetic algorithm [28]. Other algorithms aiming at minimizing power losses have been developed to date, such as the analytical approach algorithms, which perform a minimum base exchange [29].…”
Section: Review Of the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offline [4], [27] Yes Yes No Yes Heuristic No Yes [5], [17], [28] Yes No No Yes Metaheuristic No Yes [6], [21], [24] No Yes No No Experimental No Yes [7], [8], [26] No Yes No Yes Heuristic No Yes [9], [10] Yes No No Yes Heuristic No Yes [12], [13] No Yes Yes No Metaheuristic No Yes [14], [29] No Yes Yes No Experimental Yes No [15], [16] No Yes No Yes Metaheuristic No Yes [18], [32] No No No Yes Heuristic No Yes [19], [20] Yes Regardless of the algorithm used and the locations where the PLB is done, each consumer should have a smart system integrated in the SMS, which to contain in its structure a smart meter and an automatic phase load balancing device (APBD) [27], Figure 2.…”
Section: On -Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solutions for the PLB model were obtained using various techniques and technical measures, such as hierarchical Petri nets [9], low voltage (LV) feeder reconfiguration [10][11], or switching the consumers on the three phases [12][13][14]. In [15][16][17] the studied problem is solved with particular metaheuristic algorithms. A PLB mechanism at the three-phase power transformer level was proposed in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specialized literature, the balance phase problem, with the minimizing power losses approach, has been solved using different optimization methods, including the Chu and Beasley genetic algorithms [8,16,[21][22][23][24], particle swarm optimization [9], mixedinteger convex optimization [25], bat optimization algorithm [26], differential evolution algorithm [27], simulated annealing optimizer [28], and vortex search algorithm [15], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%