2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.100503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-breaking effects in superconducting heterostructures

Abstract: We present a theoretical analysis of a zero-temperature charge transport in a double-barrier structure formed by normal and superconducting electrodes with a partially dephasing mesoscopic region between two insulating layers. A scattering theory approach permits us to investigate a crossover from phase-coherent to sequential carrier transmission caused by inelastic phase-randomizing events. For a weakly transmitting junction, we derive a simple expression describing their effect on the superconducting tunneli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, φ(k e ) and φ(k h ) are the phase of the order parameter for electronic like quasiparticles and hole like quasiparticles respectively, with k e and k h being the respective wavevectors for the electronic like quasiparticles and hole like quasiparticles 14 . From Refs.…”
Section: Theory Of the Pumped Charge Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, φ(k e ) and φ(k h ) are the phase of the order parameter for electronic like quasiparticles and hole like quasiparticles respectively, with k e and k h being the respective wavevectors for the electronic like quasiparticles and hole like quasiparticles 14 . From Refs.…”
Section: Theory Of the Pumped Charge Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] also revealed differences between s − wave and d x 2 −y 2 − wave superconductors. Further inclusion of phase breaking effects 14 in double barriers formed by normal and superconducting electrodes revealed a double peaked structure in case of s − wave while a dramatic reduction of zero bias maximum for d x 2 −y 2 − wave superconductors. These are in addition to many other works which involve spin polarized transport in ferromagnet-superconductor junctions 15,16,17 which reveal differences between different possible High-T c order parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) in Ref. 13. In our discussion for a hybrid superconducting device, we start again with the simplest situation of identical wavenumbers k 1 = k 2 = k 3 = k 0 and two identical superconductors S 2 and S 3 with the energy gap ∆ when, as was shown above, the Braess paradox is revealed itself.…”
Section: Three-arm Beam Splittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we keep the basic notations for the transport problem similar to those used for solving it in the case of conventional NIS junctions 12,13 and introduce the following matrices: …”
Section: Three-arm Beam Splittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy dependence of the transmission coefficients lies in the scattering characteristics for an electron reflected into a hole and vice versa [11] (2) where δ is the Dynes parameter, we will use δ = 10-3, and the angular dependence of the order parameter phase Φ(Θ) and module ∆(Θ) are determined by the symmetry of the superconducting state (s-or d-wave type). In the most cases (s-wave symmetry), the dependence on the tunneling direction Θ is weak and .…”
Section: General Expression For Shot Noise In the Frame Of Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%