Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Generally speaking, while making decisions, it is more customary to rely on intuition rather than any form of numerical technique. In areas where there are many options and many factors impacting the choice, such as the selection of materials, a more precise approach would be necessary. It is necessary to understand the material's characteristics, price, design principles, and interactions while making mechanical parts. Material science has not only produced traditional materials such as metals, ceramics, and polymers but has also given rise to various novel materials like composites, smart (intelligent) materials, and functionally graded materials. A designer now has access to a wider range of materials than ever before thanks to the growth of knowledge. In these instances, a strategic choice must be made in order to satisfy all the functional specifications of the product while upholding client requests and preferences. The performance criteria of the component must be specified, along with a general description of the properties and processing needs of the primary material, As the first stage of the material selection process. Consequently, certain material types might be ruled out, while others are chosen as potential options for the component. The relevant material properties are subsequently listed and assigned a priority ranking. The best material can then be chosen using optimization techniques. The result of the COPRAS analysis is followed by Al 2024-T4 is the first rank, Carbon 63% Epoxy is last rank. Based on the analysis, the materials ranked highest for usage are as follows: Al 2024-T4 aluminum alloy, E-glass 73%-Epoxy, E-glass 56% Epoxy, and E-glass 65% Polyester. These selections have been carefully assessed and determined to be the most suitable options, taking into account their specific properties and how well they align with the intended application. The Al 2024-T4 aluminum alloy exhibits excellent strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance, making it an ideal choice for structural components. E-glass 73%-Epoxy, E-glass 56% Epoxy, and E-glass 65% Polyester offer a combination of strength, flexibility, and durability, catering to various requirements within the application. The meticulous evaluation of these materials ensures that the chosen ones will deliver optimal performance and reliability in the designated context.
Generally speaking, while making decisions, it is more customary to rely on intuition rather than any form of numerical technique. In areas where there are many options and many factors impacting the choice, such as the selection of materials, a more precise approach would be necessary. It is necessary to understand the material's characteristics, price, design principles, and interactions while making mechanical parts. Material science has not only produced traditional materials such as metals, ceramics, and polymers but has also given rise to various novel materials like composites, smart (intelligent) materials, and functionally graded materials. A designer now has access to a wider range of materials than ever before thanks to the growth of knowledge. In these instances, a strategic choice must be made in order to satisfy all the functional specifications of the product while upholding client requests and preferences. The performance criteria of the component must be specified, along with a general description of the properties and processing needs of the primary material, As the first stage of the material selection process. Consequently, certain material types might be ruled out, while others are chosen as potential options for the component. The relevant material properties are subsequently listed and assigned a priority ranking. The best material can then be chosen using optimization techniques. The result of the COPRAS analysis is followed by Al 2024-T4 is the first rank, Carbon 63% Epoxy is last rank. Based on the analysis, the materials ranked highest for usage are as follows: Al 2024-T4 aluminum alloy, E-glass 73%-Epoxy, E-glass 56% Epoxy, and E-glass 65% Polyester. These selections have been carefully assessed and determined to be the most suitable options, taking into account their specific properties and how well they align with the intended application. The Al 2024-T4 aluminum alloy exhibits excellent strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance, making it an ideal choice for structural components. E-glass 73%-Epoxy, E-glass 56% Epoxy, and E-glass 65% Polyester offer a combination of strength, flexibility, and durability, catering to various requirements within the application. The meticulous evaluation of these materials ensures that the chosen ones will deliver optimal performance and reliability in the designated context.
This research is architectural space in blast-resistant buildings Aims to determine status and its effective indicators. Explosion-proof structures are necessary to protect personnel from construction hazards created when personnel work in potentially explosive areas. Blast-proof buildings usually precast cast-in-place concrete or Constructed of steel frosted steel frames are permanent structures. Suitable types of window glass and provides specific recommendations on contraindications. Incorporating blast-resistant glazing into its framing and It mentions the considerations involved in linking. Most notably, laminated glass and made of laminated glass Based on traditional window glass design methods for insulating glass Authors relatively to simplify the design of explosion-resistant glazing them offer a simple approach. Weighted Production Method (WPM) is less important than TOPSIS method and a more stringent method for penalizing computationally cheaper alternatives. It is dimensionless and the rank abnormality problem is not applicable to WPM. Option code of each alternative independent of other alternatives, More acceptable One can set the limit for the option code. Hence, for dynamic decision-making situations we recommend WPM as a better alternative than TOPSIS. Blast resistant building is alternatives are reconstruction capability (C1), implementation costs (C2), access to material supply (C3), maintenance costs (C4), environmental footprint (C5) and reduction of energy loss (C6). Evaluation Parameter is Brick Façade (A1), Stone Façade (A2), Coatings Cement Façade (A3) and Composite Façade (A4). In this type of analysis, WPM methods determine for the best solution to settlement, As a result, access to material supply (C3) is got the first rank whereas is reconstruction capability (C1) is having the lowest rank.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.