1996
DOI: 10.1107/s090744499500761x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase combination and cross validation in iterated density-modification calculations

Abstract: A variety of density-modification techniques are now available for improving electron-density maps in accordance with known chemical information. This modification must, however, always be constrained by consistency with the experimental data. This is conventionally achieved by alternating cycles of map modification in real space with recombination with the experimental data in reciprocal space. The phase recombination is based upon the assumption that the density-modified map may be treated as a partial model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
215
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
215
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The information gained from peptidase assays and SUMO sequence alignments led to our proposal that the residues at the P 35 , P 29 , and P 5 -P 7 positions of SUMO contribute to the substrate specificity of XopD (Figs. 1, 3, and 8).…”
Section: Substrate Specificity Of Xopd-previous Results Showing Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The information gained from peptidase assays and SUMO sequence alignments led to our proposal that the residues at the P 35 , P 29 , and P 5 -P 7 positions of SUMO contribute to the substrate specificity of XopD (Figs. 1, 3, and 8).…”
Section: Substrate Specificity Of Xopd-previous Results Showing Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location of heavy atom sites, phase calculation, and refinement were performed with the program Solve (28). Density modification was carried out with the program dm (29). An initial model was constructed automatically using the program ARP/wARP (30) XopD-(335-520)(C470A) crystals were isomorphous to the wild-type crystals; model building and refinement followed a protocol similar to that used for the wild-type structure.…”
Section: Protein Expression and Purification For Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining Se site was identified from the difference Fourier map calculated with these five Se sites by using the program SHARP (14). The initial phase was recalculated by SHARP with all six Se sites and improved by solvent-flattening using the program SOLOMON (15) and noncrystallographic symmetry (NCS) averaging using the program DM (16). The initial model was manually traced and refined semiautomatically by using the program LAFIRE (M.Y., Y. Zhou, and I.T., unpublished work) with the program CNS (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the expected heavy atoms were determined by SHELXD (Schneider and Sheldrick, 2002), and then initial phases were determined using Phaser (McCoy et al, 2007). Density modification was performed by DM (Cowtan and Main, 1996). Approximately 90% of the Dare-PTX residues were traced automatically by ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al, 2001).…”
Section: Data Refinement and Structure Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%