2020
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase‐Contrast MRI Detection of Ventricular Shunt CSF Flow: Proof of Principle

Abstract: The evaluation of a suspected malfunction of a ventricular shunt is a common procedure in neurosurgery. The evaluation relies on either the interpretation of the ventricular width using cranial imaging or invasive techniques. Several attempts have been made to measure the flow velocity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) utilizing different phasecontrast magnet resonance imaging (PC MRI) techniques. In the present study, we evaluated 3 T (Tesla) MRI scanners for their effectiveness in determining of flow in the paren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase-contrast MRI on the flow in the catheter has been considered for noninvasive shunt function testing, although this method seemed less sensitive in iNPH than in obstructive hydrocephalus. 35,36 Ultrasound 37 and thermal sensing 38 have been presented as other possible methods of noninvasive shunt testing, but to our knowledge have not been tried in patients with iNPH, in which flow-based methods are potentially less reliable due to lower flow rates when compared with obstructive hydrocephalus. Despite the 1-month run-in period after surgery at PL 1.5, 8 participants developed subdural effusions, all of them at PL 1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase-contrast MRI on the flow in the catheter has been considered for noninvasive shunt function testing, although this method seemed less sensitive in iNPH than in obstructive hydrocephalus. 35,36 Ultrasound 37 and thermal sensing 38 have been presented as other possible methods of noninvasive shunt testing, but to our knowledge have not been tried in patients with iNPH, in which flow-based methods are potentially less reliable due to lower flow rates when compared with obstructive hydrocephalus. Despite the 1-month run-in period after surgery at PL 1.5, 8 participants developed subdural effusions, all of them at PL 1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 A recent phase contrast method using quantitative flow encoding, with the velocity encoding tuned to target very slow flow, had a feasible and promising quantitative phantom test result but showed degradation in performance under in vivo conditions, resulting in only qualitative indications of flow in patient samples. 22 Quantitative flow enhancement of signal intensity (qFENSI), 23 a blood flow measurement technique to measure slow blood flow or flux in the microcirculation, was previously developed and tested for functional imaging of reactive hyperemia. The current study expands this technique to measure coherent slow flow in CSF shunts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of specialized coils to provide highly localized scanning at the site of the shunt, there have been successful approaches that have achieved quantitative accuracy in particular geometries 19,20 or with special flow‐encoding settings 21 . A recent phase contrast method using quantitative flow encoding, with the velocity encoding tuned to target very slow flow, had a feasible and promising quantitative phantom test result but showed degradation in performance under in vivo conditions, resulting in only qualitative indications of flow in patient samples 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a crucial factor in parallel imaging is the smoothness of the coil estimation methods, which greatly influence the quality of the complex-valued imagery. Phase singularity has appeared in the recent literature, such as deep-learning frameworks [26] or phase-contrast MRI [27], forcing one to include the second dominant eigenvector [28]. Some networks effectively mitigate the phase singularity of eigen-decomposition [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%