2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00740-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase diagram, morphology development and vulcanization induced phase separation in blends of syndiotactic polypropylene and ethylene–propylene diene terpolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is similar to chemical cross-linking-induced phase immiscibility in multicomponent polymeric systems. 33 For example, theoretical and experimental investigations by Anthemaaten et al of model immiscible binary blends containing monodisperse polystyrene and polybutadiene functionalized with UPy have also revealed immiscibility over a much wider composition range than their unfunctionalized analog. 34 We further examined this UPy-induced phaseseparation by comparing the phase morphology of HTPB/ SPEB IPNs (with UPy; Figure 3) with control HTPB/PEB IPNs (without UPy; Figure S7) both UV-irradiated for 20 min.…”
Section: Phase Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is similar to chemical cross-linking-induced phase immiscibility in multicomponent polymeric systems. 33 For example, theoretical and experimental investigations by Anthemaaten et al of model immiscible binary blends containing monodisperse polystyrene and polybutadiene functionalized with UPy have also revealed immiscibility over a much wider composition range than their unfunctionalized analog. 34 We further examined this UPy-induced phaseseparation by comparing the phase morphology of HTPB/ SPEB IPNs (with UPy; Figure 3) with control HTPB/PEB IPNs (without UPy; Figure S7) both UV-irradiated for 20 min.…”
Section: Phase Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,26] The origin of this disagreement can be explained by the small region of miscibility, which is located above T m of iPP and below the thermodynamic miscibility gap of the blend (gray area in Figure 4), the latter being characterized by a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) at a composition ratio close to unity. [25,27] Since the binodal conditions of the miscibility gap cross T m (i.e., LCST <T m ) over a broad composition range, miscibility can only be observed at low and high iPP contents.…”
Section: Compatibility Of Ipp/app-co-enb Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that blending of polymers has significant impact on the crystallisation properties of individual polymer [6,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. At the same time, the changes in crystallisation behaviour of these polymers reflect in their end use properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%