2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364020030108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Diagrams of Iron Hydrides at Pressures of 100–400 GPa and Temperatures of 0–5000 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stable phase is located on the convex hull with regard to a formation from basic elements. Previous research by Bazhanova et al (2012) and Sagatova et al (2020) found metastable structures with compositions Fe x H y (x > y): Fe 4 H, Fe 3 H, and Fe 2 H. We confirmed that these structures were metastable at inner core pressures using the enthalpies of formation calculated here. As shown in Figure 1, for Fe x H y with x ≤ y, FeH, FeH 3 , Fe 3 H 5 , Fe 3 H 11 , and FeH 6 were found to be stable at core pressures while the structures of FeH 7 , FeH 8 , FeH 9 , and FeH 10 are metastable as they fall outside of the convex hull (Sagatova et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fe-h Binary At Ultrahigh Pressuressupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stable phase is located on the convex hull with regard to a formation from basic elements. Previous research by Bazhanova et al (2012) and Sagatova et al (2020) found metastable structures with compositions Fe x H y (x > y): Fe 4 H, Fe 3 H, and Fe 2 H. We confirmed that these structures were metastable at inner core pressures using the enthalpies of formation calculated here. As shown in Figure 1, for Fe x H y with x ≤ y, FeH, FeH 3 , Fe 3 H 5 , Fe 3 H 11 , and FeH 6 were found to be stable at core pressures while the structures of FeH 7 , FeH 8 , FeH 9 , and FeH 10 are metastable as they fall outside of the convex hull (Sagatova et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fe-h Binary At Ultrahigh Pressuressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The crystal structures and stabilities of Fmtrue3 $\overline{3}$m‐FeH and Pmtrue3 $\overline{3}$m‐FeH 3 (Bazhanova et al., 2012); the electronic properties, and superconductivity of I4/mmm‐FeH 5 and C2/c‐FeH 6 (Kvashnin et al., 2018); and the metallic nature of C2/c‐FeH 6 (Zhang et al., 2018) have all been reported. A topological analysis and phase diagrams of Pm3m‐FeH 3 , I4/mmm‐FeH 5 , and Cmmm‐FeH 6 at high P‐T conditions have also been presented (Sagatova et al., 2020). However, these previous Fe‐H binary structure prediction studies failed to fully consider the thermal stabilities of the structures at high pressures and temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable phase is located on the convex hull with regard to a formation from basic elements. Previous research by Bazhanova et al 19 and Sagatova et al 22 found metastable phases with compositions Fe x H y (x>y): Fe 4 H, Fe 3 H, and Fe 2 H. We con rmed that these phases were metastable at inner core pressures using the enthalpies of formation calculated here. As shown in Figure 1, for Fe x H y with x ≤ y, FeH, FeH 3 , Fe 3 H 5 , Fe 3 H 11 , and FeH 6 were found to be stable compounds at core pressure while the phases of FeH 7 , FeH 8 , FeH 9 , and FeH 10 are metastable as they fall outside of the convex hull 21,22 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For example, the crystal structure and stability of Fm m-FeH and Pm m-FeH 3 19 ; the electronic properties, and superconductivity of I4/mmm-FeH 5 and C2/c-FeH 6 20 ; and the metallic of C2/c-FeH 6 21 have all been reported. A topological analysis and phase diagrams of Pm m-FeH 3 , I4/mmm-FeH 5 , and Cmmm-FeH 6 at high P-T conditions have also been presented 22 . However, previous Fe-H binary structure prediction studies failed to fully consider the thermal stabilities at high pressures and temperatures, and/or neglected relevant geoscience properties such as the density and sound velocities of these hydrides and how this varies with different Fe-H structures in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a series of polyhydrides have also been found in which H/Fe molar ratio increases with increasing pressure: FeH 2 at 67 GPa, FeH 3 at 86 GPa, and FeH 5 at ≥130 GPa (Pépin et al., 2014, 2017). However, the polyhydrides were all synthesized at temperatures much lower (500–1500 K) than those expected for planetary interiors and some theoretical studies predict the close‐packed structured Fe‐H alloys as the most stable form up to 400 GPa (Sagatova et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%