2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase estimation using a state-space approach based method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different phase unwrapping algorithms have been proposed based on segmentwise [31][32][33] or blockwise [34][35][36] polynomial phase approximation. Although these methods provide satisfactory results in some cases, they are based on two important assumptions that require first, the true phase distribution to be spatially continuous and second, the wrapped phase measurement to be available over the entire segment or block.…”
Section: A Local Polynomial Approximation Of Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different phase unwrapping algorithms have been proposed based on segmentwise [31][32][33] or blockwise [34][35][36] polynomial phase approximation. Although these methods provide satisfactory results in some cases, they are based on two important assumptions that require first, the true phase distribution to be spatially continuous and second, the wrapped phase measurement to be available over the entire segment or block.…”
Section: A Local Polynomial Approximation Of Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier in Section 1, we can take this to be about ± W 0 2 /λ, where W 0 is the equivalent waist size for the beam. This focal spread can be re-expressed in terms of the more convenient 1/e 2 semiopening angle in intensity for the far-field pattern of the horn θ 0 , given by λ/πW 0 [19], so that the range over which there is excellent coupling is given alternatively by ± 332 × λ/(θ 0,deg ) 2 , where θ 0,deg is the 1/e 2 semi-opening angle expressed in degrees. The uncertainty in the curvature difference term Δ(1/R) should therefore satisfy the inequality…”
Section: Tolerancing Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-standard millimeter-wave horn designs, and other feed structures, the phase center may be difficult to reliably predict by simulation, in which case, an experimental determination is necessary. Although the phase center can be deduced from direct phase measurements, using expensive instrumentation such as a vector network analyzer, it is also possible to recover phase information employing other methods that rely on measuring the intensity only, especially those that have been developed at other wavelengths, for example [1][2][3][4][5]. One such method, presented in this paper, makes use of a relatively inexpensive quasi-optical phase retrieval approach based on interference of the horn under test (HUT) with a well-understood reference beam, as in a holographic recording setup [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the unwrapping methods available in the literature don't consider the effect of noise in the wrapped phase and result in noisy phase maps and frequently employ ad-hoc heuristic techniques such as median filtering to remove noise. The piecewise polynomial approximation approach [12] and signal tracking approach [15], [16] provides unwrapped phase directly, but the non-linear measurement model limits the performance of those methods. In this paper we propose a mathematically sound and more reliable restoration approach for the estimation of accurate phase map by exploiting the properties of Taylor series expansion with Kalman filter framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%