“…The sampling of surface energetics via kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) to grow and dissolve atoms in the crystal lattice circumvents the first two issues mentioned. ,,,− The trade-offs of KMC are (i) not predicting full trajectories but only the most probable intermediate states of the kinetic pathway of growth, therefore lacking in a complete description of diffusion, which is key for crystallization; (ii) considering a perfect lattice, thus lacking information on strain accumulation due to the formation of defects and their displacement, or lattice mismatch when growing over a seed composed of a different metal, both related to symmetry-breaking of NC; and (iii) the consideration of a homogeneous and constant chemical potential of the solution over the entire NC surface, thus not capturing (iii.a) ligand adsorption depending on the crystalline direction of each facet, which relates to transformation between different Wulff shapes, , nor (iii.b) heat and mass transfer-limited crystallization – that relates to symmetry breaking by a inhomogeneous precursor supply to the facets of the growing NC. , Inserting such effects into the prediction of growth and dissolution rates of KMC models while keeping the low computational cost nature of the method is an important challenge to enhance the physical chemistry prediction capabilities of a framework able to handle the growth of realistic-sized NCs.…”