2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.023401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-field modeling of the morphological evolution of ringlike structures during growth: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and template effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their nonpolar versions ({1230} and {1320}) according to the GaN Wulff plot should be faster growing than even a-planes which "sit" in local minima [21] while maxima correspond roughly to these two families of nonpolar planes. These nonpolar planes are predicted to be typical for the growth of wurtzite materials in apertures, [22] and have been reported previously for wurtzite InP nanostructures. [23] So, the appearance of expectedly fast-growing semipolar versions of these planes in our μ-holes is not completely surprising.…”
Section: Semipolar Facet Formationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Their nonpolar versions ({1230} and {1320}) according to the GaN Wulff plot should be faster growing than even a-planes which "sit" in local minima [21] while maxima correspond roughly to these two families of nonpolar planes. These nonpolar planes are predicted to be typical for the growth of wurtzite materials in apertures, [22] and have been reported previously for wurtzite InP nanostructures. [23] So, the appearance of expectedly fast-growing semipolar versions of these planes in our μ-holes is not completely surprising.…”
Section: Semipolar Facet Formationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The elastic constants of crystals with hexagonal symmetry are well known to be in-plane isotropic, meaning for example the components of Young's modulus in the a ⟨ 11 20 ⟩ and m ⟨ 10 10 ⟩ crystal directions should be identical. One reason for the observed symmetry could be the etching process, which, in a reversal of the effect seen in anisotropic growth rates [12], could result in a non-circular mesa and an anisotropic strain field; we see no evidence for this in the electron image of figure 1, though. It may instead be the case that the relaxation (and therefore expansion) of material around the mesa perimeter has resulted in a subtle 'buckling' of the epilayer, giving 6-fold periodically alternating regions of different azimuthal normal strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%