2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-field modelling and synchrotron validation of phase transformations in martensitic dual-phase steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, although the interfacial energy depends on the crystal orientation relationship between the ferrite phase and the austenite phase, the interfacial energy is assumed to be constant for all interfaces. It should be noted that the geometry coefficient of the nucleation site on the grain boundary is found in the published works of Thiessen et al 25) and Offerman et al 26) The coefficient of the deformation band, ψ d , is assumed to be the same as that of the grain boundary face, ψ g .…”
Section: Isothermal Austenite-to-ferrite Transformation Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reality, although the interfacial energy depends on the crystal orientation relationship between the ferrite phase and the austenite phase, the interfacial energy is assumed to be constant for all interfaces. It should be noted that the geometry coefficient of the nucleation site on the grain boundary is found in the published works of Thiessen et al 25) and Offerman et al 26) The coefficient of the deformation band, ψ d , is assumed to be the same as that of the grain boundary face, ψ g .…”
Section: Isothermal Austenite-to-ferrite Transformation Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Δg i (Cγ , T) is the activation energy of nucleation, which is given by the following equation: 25) .................. (18) Here, is a geometric coefficient of the nucleation site i, which represents the difference between the added and the removed interfacial energy due to nucleation at various sites. 25,26) The chemical driving force for ferrite nucleation, ΔGV (Cγ, T), can be evaluated from the chemical free energy of the Fe-C alloy based on the CALPHAD method, 27) as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Estimation Of Ferrite Nucleation On the Basis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thiessen et al [66] introduced the CNT into a general PF code and carried out the simulation of ferrite formation from a fully and a partially austenitic matrix in a dual-phase steel. The comparison between the simulations and the in-situ synchrotron experiments showed that using the temperature-and compositiondependent nucleation rates significantly improved the agreement between experimental and simulated transformation kinetics.…”
Section: Complex Transformation Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is the most general one; but considerable computational efforts are required and materials data as well as initial/boundary conditions are often unknown, (Cahn & Hilliard, 1958;Cahn, 1961;Thiessen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Cahn-hilliardmentioning
confidence: 99%