2022
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.202200205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase formation studies and crystal structure refinements in the MnII/TeIV/O/(H) system

Abstract: Systematic phase formation studies in the system MnII/TeIV/O/‐(H) using either solid‐state reactions between stoichiometric MnO:TeO2 mixtures or hydrothermal reactions under basic conditions led to crystal growth of two polymorphs (α‐, γ‐) of MnTeO3, Mn6Te5O16, Mn15(TeO3)14(OH)2 and Mn3(TeO3)2(OH)2. Although α‐MnTeO3 and Mn6Te5O16 have been reported previously, crystal structure refinements were missing so far. Whereas α‐MnTeO3 crystallizes in a unique structure (space group Pbca, Z=16), Mn6Te5O16 (Pnma, Z=4) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reproducible synthesis of the title compound obtained 30 years ago proved to be very difficult, not only because the reported fluid loss within the hydrothermal experiment is quite difficult to control, but also because the variable (Cu,Mn) ratio was at that time deliberately used for the synthesis of the of the Cu-substituted denningites. Although inserting only starting materials with Mn in the divalent state, redox reactions within the hydrothermal fluid is known to produce Mn III -bearing reaction products, as even manifested through recent investigations on phases in the system Mn II O-Te IV O2 (Eder & Weil 2022). Within the scope of attempts to reproduce K-(Cu,Mn) phases, we indeed obtained zemannite-type phases, apparently with a twofold superstructure, but not exhibiting such a strong distortion of the unit-cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reproducible synthesis of the title compound obtained 30 years ago proved to be very difficult, not only because the reported fluid loss within the hydrothermal experiment is quite difficult to control, but also because the variable (Cu,Mn) ratio was at that time deliberately used for the synthesis of the of the Cu-substituted denningites. Although inserting only starting materials with Mn in the divalent state, redox reactions within the hydrothermal fluid is known to produce Mn III -bearing reaction products, as even manifested through recent investigations on phases in the system Mn II O-Te IV O2 (Eder & Weil 2022). Within the scope of attempts to reproduce K-(Cu,Mn) phases, we indeed obtained zemannite-type phases, apparently with a twofold superstructure, but not exhibiting such a strong distortion of the unit-cell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the results of single-crystal structure analyses were inconspicuous for α-MnTeO 3 , γ-MnTeO 3 , Mn 6 Te 5 O 16 and Mn 15 (TeO 3 ) 14 (OH) 2 [14], those of the channelstructure of hexagonal Mn 3 (TeO 3 ) 2 (OH) 2 revealed some unsatisfactory features of the refined crystal structure model, in particular, high remaining electron densities located within the channels. Preliminary experiments indicated that the height of the remaining electron density depends on the metal salt used as the source for manganese(II) in the hydrothermal experiment, and that corresponding anions (CO 3 2− , SO 4 2− , SeO 4 2− , NO 3 − , Cl − , Br − ) can be incorporated into the channels where they partly substitute the prevalent OH − species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…With the objective to prepare different phases in the Mn II /Te IV /O/(H) system in the form of single-phase material, we started systematic studies of the phase formation in this system using solid-state or hydrothermal reactions. Although we were eventually able to grow single-crystals and to determine the crystal structures of α-MnTeO 3 , γ-MnTeO 3 , Mn 6 Te 5 O 16 , Mn 15 (TeO 3 ) 14 (OH) 2 and Mn 3 (TeO 3 ) 2 (OH) 2 , the intended phase purity could not be achieved because all products consisted of mixtures of different phases [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reproducible synthesis of the title compound obtained 30 years ago proved to be very difficult, not only because the reported fluid loss within the hydrothermal experiment is quite difficult to control, but also because the variable (Cu,Mn) ratio was at that time deliberately used for the synthesis of the of the Cu-substituted denningites. Although inserting only starting materials with Mn in the divalent state, redox reactions within the hydrothermal fluid is known to produce Mn III -bearing reaction products, as even manifested through recent investigations on phases in the system Mn II O-Te IV O 2 (Eder and Weil 2022). During attempts to reproduce K-(Cu,Mn) phases, we indeed obtained zemannite-type phases, apparently with a twofold superstructure, but not exhibiting such a strong distortion of the unit-cell.…”
Section: Mn IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledgements This article is dedicated to Prof. Josef Zemann (1923-2022 on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of his birthday. Constructive reviews by two anonymous experts and comments by editor Thomas Armbruster and editor-in-chief Lutz Nasdala are gratefully acknowledged.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%