2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I clinical and pharmacological evaluation of the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU006668 by chronic oral dosing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the prior oral administration shortened the t 1/2 of intravenously administered TSU-68, whereas the t 1/2 was unchanged in the case of the oral administration twice a day. The lowered exposure by oral administration observed in humans is also achieved with little change in t 1/2 (Xiong et al, 2004;Sessa et al, 2006). A possible explanation for the unchanged t 1/2 is that the observed t 1/2 after the second dose reflects the absorption rate rather than the elimination rate (i.e., flip-flop kinetics; Toutain and Bousquet-Mélou, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the prior oral administration shortened the t 1/2 of intravenously administered TSU-68, whereas the t 1/2 was unchanged in the case of the oral administration twice a day. The lowered exposure by oral administration observed in humans is also achieved with little change in t 1/2 (Xiong et al, 2004;Sessa et al, 2006). A possible explanation for the unchanged t 1/2 is that the observed t 1/2 after the second dose reflects the absorption rate rather than the elimination rate (i.e., flip-flop kinetics; Toutain and Bousquet-Mélou, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical pharmacokinetic studies, repeated oral administration of TSU-68 twice daily for 28 days resulted in an approximately 50% decrease in the AUC seen after the first administration (Brahmer et al, 2002;Murakami et al, 2003;Sessa et al, 2006). Clarifying the cause of this phenomenon would lead not only to a better understanding of the pharmacokinetic characteristics but also to a prediction of drugdrug interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose-limiting toxicities included abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, pericardial effusion and thrombocytopenia (22,23). According to Kuenen et al, the maximum tolerated dose was 100 mg/m 2 t.i.d., and no objective response was achieved in any patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase I clinical studies of TSU-68 in patients with solid tumors have been conducted (22,23). Dose-limiting toxicities included abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, pericardial effusion and thrombocytopenia (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are, however, other examples where induction of DMEs in rats is also observed in humans. For example, TSU-68, an experimental receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed autoinduction of CYP1A in rats (Kitamura et al 2007;Kitamura, Matsuoka et al 2008) and humans (Kitamura, Asanoma et al 2008;Sessa et al 2006).…”
Section: Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%