Phase I high-level waste pretreatment and feed staging plan

Tank waste remediation system operation and utilization plan,vol. I {ampersand} II

“…The previous schedule in Manuel et al (1996) indicated that the "Bootstrap Transfers" supporting the pretreatment of the 241-AZ-101 sludge (i.e., 241-AY-101 supernatant to 241-AP-106 and 241-AZ-101 supernatant to 241-AY-101) are to take place in FY 1998. These dates were based on an assumed scope and schedule for Projects W-151 and W-314.…”

“…Conversely, the potential for waste transfer conflicts or delays can be evaluated to establish either the maximum HLW processing rate or to provide a basis for negotiating an agreement between the DOE and the Privatization Contractor regarding the penalty for "Idle Facilities." The results of such an 3-63 Manuel et al (1996) suggest that the Privatization Contractor's feedhceipt tank must have the capacity to receive at least 587,000 L (155,000 gal) of HLW slurry feed per batch transfer. This "derived" requirement is required to satisfy the following three requirements from the TWRS Privatization contracts:…”

“…Based on past analyses of alternative HLW forms, it has been speculated that the product formulation in Lambert and Stegen (1996) will be similar to what the Privatization Contractor will actually propose. Therefore, these models will be used until the Privatization Contractor's actual product formulation is known.…”

“…The actual Privatization Contractor HLW feedheceipt capacity is not explicitly defined in the TWRS Privatization contracts, but any proposal of less than the minimum capacity calculated in Manuel et al (1996) will require modifications to this plan and to any or all of the three contract requirements/specifications mentioned above. Figure, 3.2-3 illustrates how the feedkeceipt capacity requirement is derived.…”

Tank waste remediation system simulation analysis retrieval model

“…HLW vitrification facilities are assunied for both Phase I and Phase 11. The DST assignments associated with HL\V vitrification are given in Figure (Manuel 1996).…”